IBLC vs. ARKB
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and ARKB (ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index while ARKB tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBLC returned 65.77% vs -37.80% for ARKB. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ARKB.
Performance
IBLC vs. ARKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 30.07% return, which is significantly higher than ARKB's -26.45% return.
IBLC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 30.07%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 65.77%
- 3Y*
- 46.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKB
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -15.02%
- YTD
- -26.45%
- 6M
- -27.12%
- 1Y
- -37.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC vs. ARKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 30.07% | 27.05% | 20.96% |
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | -26.45% | -6.59% | 86.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and ARKB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IBLC and ARKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. ARKB — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
ARKB
IBLC vs. ARKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBLC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.87 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | -0.73 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | -1.25 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. ARKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than ARKB's maximum drawdown of -52.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and ARKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -52.04% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | -52.04% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.49% | -48.78% | +34.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -16.82% | -8.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.86% | 30.37% | -7.51% |
Volatility
IBLC vs. ARKB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 17.30% compared to ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) at 12.91%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | ARKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.30% | 12.91% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.59% | 34.40% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.92% | 44.11% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.54% | 50.04% | +14.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.54% | 50.04% | +14.50% |
IBLC vs. ARKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKB's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. ARKB - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, while ARKB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKB ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.81% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and ARKB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to ARKB (12.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs ARKB's -52.04%.
On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 65.77% vs -37.80% for ARKB. On fees, ARKB is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ARKB has been the lower-risk option at 12.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 65.77% return vs -37.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARKB is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.00% for ARKB.
IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while ARKB tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.21% for ARKB.
IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and ARKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer