BLOK vs. BITY
BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while BITY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BLOK returned 30.79% vs -37.35% for BITY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLOK charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.
Performance
BLOK vs. BITY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -23.09% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 7.72%
- YTD
- 16.21%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 51.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
BITY
- 1D
- -2.61%
- 1M
- -19.63%
- YTD
- -23.09%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -37.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 16.21% | 41.45% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -23.09% | -8.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and BITY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BLOK and BITY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
BITY
BLOK vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLOK | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.85 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | -0.81 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | -1.41 | +3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLOK | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.94 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | -0.70 | +1.19 |
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than BITY's maximum drawdown of -46.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and BITY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -46.36% | -26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -46.36% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.16% | -45.49% | +35.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.08% | -19.67% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.23% | 26.48% | -10.25% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) at 9.68%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 9.68% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.55% | 31.24% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.29% | 39.94% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.36% | 39.02% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.97% | 39.02% | -0.05% |
BLOK vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than BITY's 39.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 39.66% | 21.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.62% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLOK and BITY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to BITY (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs BITY's -46.36%.
On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 30.79% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITY has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 30.79% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.
BLOK is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BLOK and 0.65% for BITY.
BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and BITY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer