BLOK vs. BCHS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L).
BLOK and BCHS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLOK is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018. BCHS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019.
Performance
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | -12.45% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -62.36% | 30.76% | 90.17% | 9.12% |
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | -10.66% | 45.45% | 16.53% | 66.63% | -52.00% | 24.86% | 94.85% | 14.79% |
Different Trading Currencies
BLOK is traded in USD, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's -10.66% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -25.18%
- 1Y
- 36.00%
- 3Y*
- 40.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- —
BCHS.L
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- YTD
- -10.66%
- 6M
- -16.98%
- 1Y
- 51.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.44%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
BCHS.L
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLOK | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.24 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.80 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 1.63 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.35 | 3.62 | -1.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLOK | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.24 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.03 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.54 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and BCHS.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF | 0.82% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than BCHS.L's maximum drawdown of -61.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and BCHS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -55.89% | -17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -29.49% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | -55.89% | -17.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.31% | -29.49% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -21.65% | -4.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.44% | 13.68% | +0.76% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) at 11.51%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | BCHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.57% | 11.51% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.07% | 29.98% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.50% | 41.59% | +0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.93% | 37.29% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.06% | 36.05% | +3.01% |