QDSIX vs. GFSYX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX).
QDSIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jun 7, 2020. GFSYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2017.
Performance
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 2.86% | 16.36% | 9.71% | 8.88% | 14.69% | 10.64% | 5.50% |
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | -0.78% | 5.49% | 7.60% | 5.98% | -0.57% | 4.96% | 3.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDSIX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than GFSYX's -0.78% return.
QDSIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- —
GFSYX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDSIX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QDSIX vs. GFSYX — Risk / Return Rank
QDSIX
GFSYX
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QDSIX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.12 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 1.59 | +0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.21 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.23 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | 5.30 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QDSIX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.12 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 1.21 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.88 | +0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between QDSIX and GFSYX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison
QDSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than GFSYX's 7.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDSIX AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund | 2.17% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 11.35% | 8.22% | 6.07% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFSYX GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund | 7.23% | 7.18% | 8.54% | 13.00% | 4.20% | 1.59% | 1.53% | 2.24% | 2.17% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDSIX drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum GFSYX drawdown of -9.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDSIX and GFSYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QDSIX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -9.54% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.53% | -1.39% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.06% | -4.49% | -2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.78% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -0.92% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 0.58% | +0.70% |
Volatility
QDSIX vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) has a higher volatility of 1.56% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.82%. This indicates that QDSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QDSIX | GFSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 0.82% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.73% | 1.78% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.36% | 2.58% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 3.64% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.39% | 3.73% | +3.66% |