BLGR vs. QLC
BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) and QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BLGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bluemonte, while QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLGR charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QLC.
Performance
BLGR vs. QLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 12.12% return.
BLGR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLC
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
BLGR vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 10.62% | 16.11% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 12.12% | 18.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLGR and QLC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.92 |
BLGR vs. QLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLGR
QLC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
BLGR
QLC
Communication Services
BLGR
QLC
Consumer Cyclical
BLGR
QLC
Financial Services
BLGR
QLC
Healthcare
BLGR
QLC
Industrials
BLGR
QLC
Consumer Defensive
BLGR
QLC
Basic Materials
BLGR
QLC
Real Estate
BLGR
QLC
Energy
BLGR
QLC
Utilities
BLGR
QLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLGR vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank
BLGR
QLC
BLGR vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLGR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 0.80 | +1.17 |
Drawdowns
BLGR vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and QLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLGR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.08% | -35.86% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.09% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -4.54% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.89% | — |
Volatility
BLGR vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLGR | QLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 12.38% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 16.82% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 18.42% | -3.04% |
BLGR vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BLGR vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison
BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QLC's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.23% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BLGR and QLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.
QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.
BLGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.25% for QLC.
Find the right allocation for BLGR and QLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer