PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLGR vs. QLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLGR vs. QLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLGR achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than QLC's 12.12% return.


BLGR

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
10.62%
6M
10.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLC

1D
0.66%
1M
5.15%
YTD
12.12%
6M
12.40%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
15.44%
10Y*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLGR vs. QLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLGR and QLC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.92

BLGR vs. QLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLGR
QLC

Technology

48.1%
34.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.9%

Financial Services

8.2%
13.8%

Healthcare

6.7%
10.1%

Industrials

6.1%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
3.2%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.2%

Real Estate

0.7%
2.3%

Energy

0.6%
2.0%

Utilities

0.6%
3.4%

Technology

BLGR
48.1%
QLC
34.8%

Communication Services

BLGR
15.8%
QLC
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

BLGR
10.7%
QLC
7.9%

Financial Services

BLGR
8.2%
QLC
13.8%

Healthcare

BLGR
6.7%
QLC
10.1%

Industrials

BLGR
6.1%
QLC
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

BLGR
1.8%
QLC
3.2%

Basic Materials

BLGR
0.8%
QLC
2.2%

Real Estate

BLGR
0.7%
QLC
2.3%

Energy

BLGR
0.6%
QLC
2.0%

Utilities

BLGR
0.6%
QLC
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLGR vs. QLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLGR

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLGR vs. QLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) and FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLGR vs. QLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLGRQLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.97

0.80

+1.17

Drawdowns

BLGR vs. QLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLGR drawdown since its inception was -14.08%, smaller than the maximum QLC drawdown of -35.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLGR and QLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLGRQLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.08%

-35.86%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.09%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.43%

-4.54%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

BLGR vs. QLC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLGRQLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

12.38%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

16.82%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.38%

18.42%

-3.04%

BLGR vs. QLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLGR has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QLC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BLGR vs. QLC - Dividend Comparison

BLGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than QLC's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLGR
Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF
0.23%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
0.87%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BLGR and QLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.23% for BLGR.

BLGR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BLGR and 0.25% for QLC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLGR and QLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer