BLES vs. UFO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BLES (Inspire Global Hope ETF) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds - BLES tracks the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index while UFO tracks the S-Network Space Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLES returned 7.14%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for UFO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLES charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.

Performance

BLES vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLES achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 20.26% return.

BLES

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.46%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 6M: 9.13%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 7.14%
• 10Y*: —

UFO

• 1D: -3.43%
• 1M: -24.91%
• YTD: 20.26%
• 6M: 16.27%
• 1Y: 68.45%
• 3Y*: 37.43%
• 5Y*: 9.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLES vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	10.01%	19.25%	5.59%	16.47%	-16.21%	24.36%	12.22%	8.89%
UFO Procure Space ETF	20.26%	67.36%	27.22%	-2.34%	-25.85%	7.17%	-2.15%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BLES and UFO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.70

The correlation between BLES and UFO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLES vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLES	UFO
Industrials	20.3%	52.2%
Technology	17.6%	19.3%
Financial Services	13.0%	0.0%
Basic Materials	9.8%	-
Real Estate	7.6%	-
Healthcare	7.0%	-
Utilities	7.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.3%	-
Energy	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Communication Services	1.0%	28.6%

Return for Risk

BLES vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLES

BLES Risk / Return Rank: 50
BLES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BLES Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BLES Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BLES Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BLES Martin Ratio Rank: 55

UFO

UFO Risk / Return Rank: 50
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLES vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLES	UFO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.69	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.28	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	2.19	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	7.90	+0.71

BLES vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLES Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the UFO Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLES and UFO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLES vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLES drawdown since its inception was -40.35%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLES and UFO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLES	UFO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-50.33%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-31.45%	+23.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.46%	-31.45%	+15.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.61%	-50.33%	+23.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.28%	-31.45%	+29.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	-21.81%	+15.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	8.69%	-6.48%

Volatility

BLES vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire Global Hope ETF (BLES) is 4.38%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 18.78%. This indicates that BLES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLES	UFO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	18.78%	-14.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	33.33%	-23.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.91%	40.84%	-27.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.50%	30.68%	-14.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.93%	31.18%	-12.25%

BLES vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLES has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLES vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

BLES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than UFO's 0.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLES Inspire Global Hope ETF	1.80%	1.97%	1.90%	1.80%	1.64%	9.28%	1.61%	2.16%	1.73%	2.01%
UFO Procure Space ETF	0.36%	0.46%	1.98%	1.90%	3.19%	1.00%	1.07%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLES and UFO in my portfolio?

BLES and UFO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLES or UFO?

UFO has higher volatility (18.78%) compared to BLES (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLES dropped -40.35% vs UFO's -50.33%.

Which ETF is better, BLES or UFO?

On 5-year performance, UFO leads with 9.53% vs 7.14% for BLES. On fees, BLES is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BLES has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLES or UFO?

Over the 5-year period, UFO has performed better with a 9.53% return vs 7.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLES or UFO?

BLES is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLES or UFO?

BLES has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.36% for UFO.

What is the main difference between BLES and UFO?

BLES tracks Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BLES and 0.75% for UFO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UFO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.