BLDX vs. PIPE

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

BLDX (Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PIPE.

Performance

BLDX vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLDX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PIPE

• 1D: -2.90%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 22.34%
• YTD: 28.20%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	$75.90K	$90.31K	$290.80K
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	$112.98K	$75.09K	$85.70K

BLDX vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	5.78%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	19.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BLDX and PIPE is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026	0.11

Return for Risk

BLDX vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 88
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDX vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLDX	PIPE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.54	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.95	—

Drawdowns

BLDX vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum PIPE drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDX and PIPE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLDX	PIPE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.26%	-15.69%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.89%	-3.70%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-3.95%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLDX	PIPE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	14.98%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	18.71%	-1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	18.71%	-1.83%

BLDX vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PIPE's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLDX vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison

BLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than PIPE's 3.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	0.97%	0.00%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.75%	3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLDX and PIPE in my portfolio?

BLDX and PIPE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLDX or PIPE?

On fees, BLDX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLDX or PIPE?

BLDX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLDX or PIPE?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.97% for BLDX.

What is the main difference between BLDX and PIPE?

They also come from different issuers: Impax Asset Management and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLDX and 0.75% for PIPE.