BLDX vs. FWD
BLDX (Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
BLDX vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLDX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -3.71%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- 51.99%
- 3Y*
- 35.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDX vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 4.78% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 19.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDX and FWD is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDX vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
BLDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FWD
BLDX vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDX | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDX vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDX and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDX | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -29.02% | +20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -9.33% | +4.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -4.07% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility
BLDX vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDX | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 27.83% | -10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 25.69% | -7.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 25.69% | -7.93% |
BLDX vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDX vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
BLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than FWD's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDX and FWD have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLDX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLDX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
BLDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.09% for FWD.
They also come from different issuers: Impax Asset Management and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLDX and 0.65% for FWD.
Find the right allocation for BLDX and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer