BLDX vs. WBIG
BLDX (Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) and WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLDX charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for WBIG.
Performance
BLDX vs. WBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BLDX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- 18.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
BLDX vs. WBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 4.78% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDX and WBIG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDX vs. WBIG — Risk / Return Rank
BLDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WBIG
BLDX vs. WBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLDX | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.50 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLDX vs. WBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, smaller than the maximum WBIG drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDX and WBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDX | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -25.32% | +17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -2.59% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -10.87% | +7.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
BLDX vs. WBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDX | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.76% | 9.99% | +7.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 12.05% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 11.55% | +6.21% |
BLDX vs. WBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIG's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLDX vs. WBIG - Dividend Comparison
BLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than WBIG's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDX Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.19% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDX and WBIG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLDX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLDX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.98% for BLDX.
They also come from different issuers: Impax Asset Management and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BLDX and 1.14% for WBIG.
Find the right allocation for BLDX and WBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer