PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLDX vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLDX vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BLDX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.68%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BILT

1D
-0.73%
1M
0.58%
6M
12.43%
YTD
16.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.76M$4.57M$1.65M
$75.90K$90.31K$290.80K

BLDX vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLDX and BILT is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLDX vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Impax Global Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (BLDX) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLDX vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLDX vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDX and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLDXBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-5.38%

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-0.73%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-1.35%

-2.21%

Volatility

BLDX vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLDXBILTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

10.31%

+6.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.88%

10.31%

+6.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

10.31%

+6.57%

BLDX vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLDX and BILT have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

BLDX vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

BLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BILT's 5.61% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLDX and BILT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLDX and BILT have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 0.97% for BLDX.

They also come from different issuers: Impax Asset Management and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLDX and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer