PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLDR vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLDR vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDR achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 31.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BLDR has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 20.07%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.29% annualized return.


BLDR

1D
-0.71%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-28.93%
6M
-31.96%
1Y
-34.50%
3Y*
-15.71%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
20.07%

QLD

1D
3.03%
1M
0.58%
YTD
31.05%
6M
26.63%
1Y
69.67%
3Y*
46.32%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
35.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLDR vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
-28.93%-28.01%-14.38%157.31%-24.30%110.02%60.61%132.91%-49.93%98.63%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
31.05%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BLDR and QLD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

0.46

The correlation between BLDR and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLDR vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDR
BLDR Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDR vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLDRQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.34

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.79

-3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.21

9.64

-10.85

BLDR vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLDR Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDR and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLDRQLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

2.10

-2.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.53

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.79

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.58

-0.47

Drawdowns

BLDR vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDR drawdown since its inception was -96.78%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDR and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLDRQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.78%

-83.13%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.51%

-25.13%

-30.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.55%

-42.29%

-26.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.55%

-63.68%

-4.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.55%

-63.68%

-4.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.37%

-8.24%

-57.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.87%

-18.16%

-29.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.59%

7.25%

+21.34%

Volatility

BLDR vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 13.13% and 13.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLDRQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

13.78%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.98%

26.34%

+7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.94%

33.42%

+14.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.20%

44.95%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.71%

44.68%

+3.03%

Dividends

BLDR vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

BLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLDR and QLD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLD has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to BLDR (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDR dropped -96.78% vs QLD's -83.13%.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLDR and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer