BLDR vs. QLD
BLDR (Builders FirstSource, Inc.) is a stock, while QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, BLDR returned 20.07%/yr vs 35.29%/yr for QLD. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BLDR vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLDR achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 31.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BLDR has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 20.07%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.29% annualized return.
BLDR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -31.96%
- 1Y
- -34.50%
- 3Y*
- -15.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.07%
QLD
- 1D
- 3.03%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 31.05%
- 6M
- 26.63%
- 1Y
- 69.67%
- 3Y*
- 46.32%
- 5Y*
- 23.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.29%
BLDR vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | -28.93% | -28.01% | -14.38% | 157.31% | -24.30% | 110.02% | 60.61% | 132.91% | -49.93% | 98.63% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 31.05% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLDR and QLD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.46 |
The correlation between BLDR and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLDR vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
BLDR
QLD
BLDR vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLDR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.34 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | 2.79 | -3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 9.64 | -10.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLDR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 2.10 | -2.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.79 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.58 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
BLDR vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLDR drawdown since its inception was -96.78%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDR and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLDR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.78% | -83.13% | -13.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -25.13% | -30.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.55% | -42.29% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.55% | -63.68% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.55% | -63.68% | -4.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.37% | -8.24% | -57.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.87% | -18.16% | -29.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.59% | 7.25% | +21.34% |
Volatility
BLDR vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) have volatilities of 13.13% and 13.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLDR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 13.78% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.98% | 26.34% | +7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.94% | 33.42% | +14.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.20% | 44.95% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.71% | 44.68% | +3.03% |
Dividends
BLDR vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
BLDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLDR and QLD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (13.78%) compared to BLDR (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDR dropped -96.78% vs QLD's -83.13%.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLDR and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer