PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLDG vs. SYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLDG vs. SYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLDG achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than SYLD's 14.35% return.


BLDG

1D
0.82%
1M
0.01%
YTD
6.82%
6M
6.29%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
2.40%
10Y*

SYLD

1D
0.64%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
14.35%
6M
13.91%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
13.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLDG vs. SYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
6.82%4.26%8.18%1.76%-14.66%22.47%15.37%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
14.35%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%32.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BLDG and SYLD is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.66

The correlation between BLDG and SYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLDG vs. SYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLDG
SYLD

Real Estate

98.6%

-

Financial Services

1.4%
22.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.9%

Communication Services

-

6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

22.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.8%

Energy

-

17.7%

Healthcare

-

5.6%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Technology

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

BLDG
98.6%
SYLD

-

Financial Services

BLDG
1.4%
SYLD
22.7%

Basic Materials

BLDG

-

SYLD
7.9%

Communication Services

BLDG

-

SYLD
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BLDG

-

SYLD
22.9%

Consumer Defensive

BLDG

-

SYLD
6.8%

Energy

BLDG

-

SYLD
17.7%

Healthcare

BLDG

-

SYLD
5.6%

Industrials

BLDG

-

SYLD
8.1%

Technology

BLDG

-

SYLD
2.3%

Utilities

BLDG

-

SYLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLDG vs. SYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLDG
BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLDG vs. SYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) and Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLDGSYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.91

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.88

10.60

-6.72

BLDG vs. SYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the SYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLDG and SYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLDGSYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.75

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.29

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.57

-0.11

Drawdowns

BLDG vs. SYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLDG drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, smaller than the maximum SYLD drawdown of -45.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLDG and SYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLDGSYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.25%

-45.36%

+18.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

-6.93%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.57%

-26.62%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.25%

-26.62%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.68%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-5.66%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.55%

+0.31%

Volatility

BLDG vs. SYLD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) at 2.99%. This indicates that BLDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLDGSYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

2.99%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

9.96%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

15.51%

-4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

20.62%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

22.95%

-7.41%

BLDG vs. SYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLDG and SYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

BLDG vs. SYLD - Dividend Comparison

BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than SYLD's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLDG
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
5.68%7.46%7.97%4.99%3.99%10.40%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.85%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLDG and SYLD have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLDG has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to SYLD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLDG dropped -27.25% vs SYLD's -45.36%.

On 5-year performance, SYLD leads with 5.89% vs 2.40% for BLDG. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, SYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 5.89% return vs 2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BLDG and SYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 1.85% for SYLD.

BLDG is categorized as REIT, while SYLD is Mid Cap Value Equities.

SYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLDG and SYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer