BLCV vs. LCTD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD).

BLCV and LCTD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BLCV is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on May 19, 2023. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021.

Performance

BLCV vs. LCTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BLCV vs. LCTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	-2.92%	19.96%	12.63%	15.71%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	1.14%	30.42%	3.14%	6.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCV achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than LCTD's 1.14% return.

BLCV

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -5.90%
• YTD: -2.92%
• 6M: 1.43%
• 1Y: 12.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCTD

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -7.73%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCV vs. LCTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LCTD's 0.20% expense ratio.

BLCV

Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF

LCTD

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF

Return for Risk

BLCV vs. LCTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV

BLCV Risk / Return Rank: 47
BLCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BLCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BLCV Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BLCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BLCV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 78
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCV vs. LCTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLCV	LCTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	1.43	-0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	2.00	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.29	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	2.13	-0.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	8.08	-3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLCV vs. LCTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the LCTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCV and LCTD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLCV	LCTD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83	1.43	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.43	+0.80

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and LCTD is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BLCV vs. LCTD - Dividend Comparison

BLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than LCTD's 3.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.40%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.57%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%

Drawdowns

BLCV vs. LCTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCV drawdown since its inception was -13.44%, smaller than the maximum LCTD drawdown of -29.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCV and LCTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCV	LCTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.44%	-29.82%	+16.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-10.92%	-0.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.81%	-7.95%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.06%	-6.91%	+4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.88%	-0.01%

Volatility

BLCV vs. LCTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) is 4.74%, while BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that BLCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCV	LCTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.74%	7.53%	-2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	10.99%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.51%	17.08%	-1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.81%	16.02%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.81%	16.02%	-3.21%