BLCV vs. DIVB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BLCV (Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF) and DIVB (iShares Core Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while DIVB is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend and Buyback Index. BLCV is actively managed, while DIVB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLCV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for DIVB.

Performance

BLCV vs. DIVB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLCV

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVB

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: 3.84%
• 6M: 18.62%
• YTD: 22.13%
• 1Y: 30.52%
• 3Y*: 21.77%
• 5Y*: 13.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCV vs. DIVB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	6.47%	19.96%	12.63%	14.56%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	22.13%	15.09%	18.59%	14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCV and DIVB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023	0.89

The correlation between BLCV and DIVB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BLCV vs. DIVB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DIVB

DIVB Risk / Return Rank: 90
DIVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DIVB Omega Ratio Rank: 89
DIVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DIVB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCV vs. DIVB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF (BLCV) and iShares Core Dividend ETF (DIVB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCV	DIVB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.53	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.05	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCV	DIVB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.93%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-4.94%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLCV	DIVB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.50%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.16%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	15.35%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.35%	—

BLCV vs. DIVB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCV vs. DIVB - Dividend Comparison

BLCV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLCV Blackrock Large Cap Value ETF	1.01%	1.37%	1.63%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF	2.17%	2.50%	2.61%	3.18%	2.02%	1.63%	2.08%	2.07%	2.52%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCV and DIVB in my portfolio?

BLCV and DIVB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLCV or DIVB?

On fees, DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCV or DIVB?

DIVB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for BLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLCV or DIVB?

DIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.01% for BLCV.

What is the main difference between BLCV and DIVB?

BLCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIVB is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BLCV and 0.05% for DIVB.