BLCK.TO vs. PAVE
BLCK.TO (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCK.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCK.TO returned 14.83%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCK.TO charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BLCK.TO is traded in CAD, while PAVE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAVE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCK.TO achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 21.40% return.
BLCK.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 33.56%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 21.40%
- 6M
- 18.41%
- 1Y
- 38.92%
- 3Y*
- 28.25%
- 5Y*
- 20.74%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 13.83% | 24.94% | 25.85% | 18.34% | -14.89% | 18.96% | 13.50% | 26.93% | -7.66% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 21.40% | 13.89% | 28.05% | 28.13% | -0.56% | 35.19% | 17.70% | 26.71% | -9.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCK.TO and PAVE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.06 |
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Financial Services
-
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
BLCK.TO
PAVE
-
Technology
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Communication Services
BLCK.TO
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
BLCK.TO
PAVE
-
Industrials
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Utilities
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Basic Materials
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Consumer Defensive
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Healthcare
BLCK.TO
PAVE
-
Energy
BLCK.TO
PAVE
Real Estate
BLCK.TO
-
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
BLCK.TO
PAVE
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCK.TO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 3.32 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 12.83 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCK.TO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.10 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.76 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCK.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.29%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCK.TO and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCK.TO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.29% | -38.99% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -11.78% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.88% | -24.93% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -24.93% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -5.41% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 3.04% | -0.51% |
Volatility
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) is 4.49%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that BLCK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCK.TO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 6.41% | -1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 15.08% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 18.65% | -5.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 19.51% | -5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 22.27% | -6.36% |
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCK.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
BLCK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 1.19% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 3.16% | 1.26% | 0.25% | 2.43% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCK.TO and PAVE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BLCK.TO.
BLCK.TO is categorized as Blockchain, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. BLCK.TO tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BLCK.TO and 0.47% for PAVE.
Find the right allocation for BLCK.TO and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer