BLCK.TO vs. PAVE

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

BLCK.TO (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCK.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCK.TO returned 13.89%/yr vs 21.98%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCK.TO charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.

Performance

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BLCK.TO is traded in CAD, while PAVE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PAVE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCK.TO achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 28.14% return.

BLCK.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 11.27%
• 6M: 12.16%
• 1Y: 25.24%
• 3Y*: 24.78%
• 5Y*: 13.89%
• 10Y*: —

PAVE

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 8.06%
• YTD: 28.14%
• 6M: 26.81%
• 1Y: 41.61%
• 3Y*: 27.10%
• 5Y*: 21.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF	11.27%	24.94%	25.85%	18.34%	-14.89%	18.96%	13.50%	26.93%	-6.92%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	28.14%	13.92%	27.91%	27.89%	-1.29%	36.35%	16.88%	27.77%	-10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCK.TO and PAVE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018	0.03

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLCK.TO	PAVE
Financial Services	39.8%	-
Technology	31.8%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Industrials	5.7%	76.1%
Utilities	1.9%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.7%	19.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Energy	0.7%	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCK.TO

BLCK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 68
BLCK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BLCK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
BLCK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 69
BLCK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BLCK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 67
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLCK.TO	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.06	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	2.90	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.35	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	3.59	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.34	13.59	-3.25

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCK.TO and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCK.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.29%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCK.TO and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLCK.TO	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.29%	-39.13%	+12.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-11.64%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.88%	-25.31%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.67%	-25.31%	+0.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-1.79%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.03%	-5.52%	+0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	3.07%	-0.48%

Volatility

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) is 5.98%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that BLCK.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLCK.TO	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	7.89%	-1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.35%	16.75%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	20.28%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.31%	22.39%	-8.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	25.05%	-8.99%

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCK.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLCK.TO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

BLCK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than PAVE's 0.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF	1.04%	1.44%	1.45%	1.65%	3.16%	1.26%	0.25%	2.43%	0.87%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.73%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLCK.TO and PAVE in my portfolio?

BLCK.TO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLCK.TO or PAVE?

On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLCK.TO or PAVE?

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BLCK.TO.

What is the main difference between BLCK.TO and PAVE?

BLCK.TO is categorized as Blockchain, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. BLCK.TO tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BLCK.TO and 0.47% for PAVE.