BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO
BLCK.TO (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF) and FST.TO (First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLCK.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while FST.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. BLCK.TO is passively managed, while FST.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BLCK.TO returned 14.83%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for FST.TO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLCK.TO charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FST.TO.
Performance
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLCK.TO achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than FST.TO's 8.82% return.
BLCK.TO
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- 13.83%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 33.56%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.83%
- 10Y*
- —
FST.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 29.93%
- 3Y*
- 23.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- —
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 13.83% | 24.94% | 25.85% | 18.34% | -14.89% | 18.96% | 13.50% | 26.93% | -7.66% |
FST.TO First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF | 8.82% | 29.77% | 26.23% | 12.01% | 2.26% | 19.40% | 2.56% | 16.10% | -4.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLCK.TO and FST.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.20 |
The correlation between BLCK.TO and FST.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Technology
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Communication Services
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Industrials
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Utilities
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
-
Basic Materials
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Consumer Defensive
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Healthcare
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
-
Energy
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
Real Estate
BLCK.TO
-
FST.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BLCK.TO
FST.TO
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLCK.TO | FST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.45 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 4.29 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 19.64 | -6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLCK.TO | FST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.43 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 1.20 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.83 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLCK.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.29%, smaller than the maximum FST.TO drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCK.TO and FST.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLCK.TO | FST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.29% | -38.15% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -7.01% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.88% | -12.33% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.67% | -14.73% | -9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.41% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -3.27% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.53% | +1.00% |
Volatility
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) at 2.60%. This indicates that BLCK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLCK.TO | FST.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 2.60% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 9.82% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 12.38% | +0.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 14.04% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 15.32% | +0.59% |
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLCK.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FST.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Dividend Comparison
BLCK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FST.TO's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLCK.TO First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF | 1.19% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 3.16% | 1.26% | 0.25% | 2.43% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
FST.TO First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF | 0.93% | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 1.91% | 1.37% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLCK.TO and FST.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FST.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FST.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BLCK.TO.
BLCK.TO is categorized as Blockchain, while FST.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BLCK.TO and 0.65% for FST.TO.
Find the right allocation for BLCK.TO and FST.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer