PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLCK.TO achieves a 13.83% return, which is significantly higher than FST.TO's 8.82% return.


BLCK.TO

1D
0.60%
1M
9.74%
YTD
13.83%
6M
16.39%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
25.35%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*

FST.TO

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.37%
YTD
8.82%
6M
10.70%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
23.82%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BLCK.TO
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF
13.83%24.94%25.85%18.34%-14.89%18.96%13.50%26.93%-7.66%
FST.TO
First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF
8.82%29.77%26.23%12.01%2.26%19.40%2.56%16.10%-4.73%

Correlation

The correlation between BLCK.TO and FST.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.20

The correlation between BLCK.TO and FST.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLCK.TO
FST.TO

Financial Services

42.5%
20.2%

Technology

27.3%
12.0%

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
17.1%

Industrials

5.6%
18.9%

Utilities

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
3.9%

Healthcare

1.3%

-

Energy

0.8%
15.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

BLCK.TO
42.5%
FST.TO
20.2%

Technology

BLCK.TO
27.3%
FST.TO
12.0%

Communication Services

BLCK.TO
8.9%
FST.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

BLCK.TO
8.5%
FST.TO
17.1%

Industrials

BLCK.TO
5.6%
FST.TO
18.9%

Utilities

BLCK.TO
2.1%
FST.TO

-

Basic Materials

BLCK.TO
1.6%
FST.TO
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

BLCK.TO
1.4%
FST.TO
3.9%

Healthcare

BLCK.TO
1.3%
FST.TO

-

Energy

BLCK.TO
0.8%
FST.TO
15.3%

Real Estate

BLCK.TO

-

FST.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLCK.TO
BLCK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
BLCK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FST.TO
FST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) and First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLCK.TOFST.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

4.29

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

19.64

-6.35

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLCK.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the FST.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLCK.TO and FST.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLCK.TOFST.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.43

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Drawdowns

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLCK.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.29%, smaller than the maximum FST.TO drawdown of -38.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLCK.TO and FST.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLCK.TOFST.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.29%

-38.15%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-7.01%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.88%

-12.33%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-14.73%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.41%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-3.27%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.53%

+1.00%

Volatility

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF (BLCK.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF (FST.TO) at 2.60%. This indicates that BLCK.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLCK.TOFST.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.60%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

9.82%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

12.38%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

14.04%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

15.32%

+0.59%

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLCK.TO has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FST.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLCK.TO vs. FST.TO - Dividend Comparison

BLCK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than FST.TO's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLCK.TO
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction and Process ETF
1.19%1.44%1.45%1.65%3.16%1.26%0.25%2.43%0.87%0.00%
FST.TO
First Trust Canadian Capital Strength ETF
0.93%1.01%1.16%1.63%2.03%1.87%1.85%1.91%1.37%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLCK.TO and FST.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FST.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FST.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BLCK.TO.

BLCK.TO is categorized as Blockchain, while FST.TO is Canada Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BLCK.TO and 0.65% for FST.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLCK.TO and FST.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer