PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLBD vs. RUSHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLBD achieves a 64.64% return, which is significantly higher than RUSHA's 40.67% return. Over the past 10 years, BLBD has underperformed RUSHA with an annualized return of 20.20%, while RUSHA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.43% annualized return.


BLBD

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.16%
6M
59.78%
YTD
64.64%
1Y
72.15%
3Y*
51.55%
5Y*
27.22%
10Y*
20.20%

RUSHA

1D
2.08%
1M
7.86%
6M
29.31%
YTD
40.67%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
24.96%
5Y*
22.58%
10Y*
23.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
64.64%21.67%43.29%151.73%-31.52%-14.35%-20.33%26.00%-8.59%28.80%
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
40.67%-0.15%10.44%46.73%-4.51%36.44%35.37%36.49%-31.74%59.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BLBD and RUSHA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2014

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLBD:

$2.45B

RUSHA:

$5.87B

EPS

BLBD:

$4.07

RUSHA:

$3.31

PE Ratio

BLBD:

19.01

RUSHA:

22.83

PEG Ratio

BLBD:

0.18

RUSHA:

2.86

PS Ratio

BLBD:

1.69

RUSHA:

0.83

PB Ratio

BLBD:

8.46

RUSHA:

2.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLBD:

$1.49B

RUSHA:

$7.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLBD:

$314.22M

RUSHA:

$1.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLBD:

$181.06M

RUSHA:

$500.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLBD vs. RUSHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLBD
BLBD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BLBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BLBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLBD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

RUSHA
RUSHA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
RUSHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RUSHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RUSHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RUSHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
RUSHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLBDRUSHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

1.99

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

4.75

+2.02

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the RUSHA Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLBD and RUSHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLBD drawdown since its inception was -74.16%, roughly equal to the maximum RUSHA drawdown of -71.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLBD and RUSHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLBDRUSHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.16%

-71.91%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-20.81%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-26.76%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.28%

-27.27%

-44.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.16%

-47.89%

-26.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-0.68%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-17.50%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.39%

8.72%

+1.67%

Volatility

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Volatility Comparison

Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) at 8.81%. This indicates that BLBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLBDRUSHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

8.81%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.46%

22.19%

+9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.42%

30.48%

+12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.55%

30.55%

+26.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.35%

33.19%

+18.16%

Dividends

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Dividend Comparison

BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RUSHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.01%1.37%1.28%1.23%1.53%1.33%0.98%1.08%0.70%

Financials

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Bird Corporation and Rush Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
352.64M
1.68B
(BLBD) Total Revenue
(RUSHA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLBD vs. RUSHA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Blue Bird Corporation and Rush Enterprises, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.0%
20.4%
Portfolio components
BLBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.65M and revenue of 352.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

RUSHA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.80M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.

BLBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 39.12M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

RUSHA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.21M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

BLBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

RUSHA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 61.45M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLBD and RUSHA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLBD has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to RUSHA (8.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLBD dropped -74.16% vs RUSHA's -71.91%.

BLBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLBD and RUSHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer