RUSHA vs. TIMB
RUSHA (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) and TIMB (TIM S.A.) are both stocks. RUSHA operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while TIMB operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, RUSHA returned 22.35%/yr vs 19.04%/yr for TIMB. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUSHA achieves a 48.70% return, which is significantly higher than TIMB's -0.09% return.
RUSHA
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 24.96%
- YTD
- 48.70%
- 1Y
- 50.88%
- 3Y*
- 24.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.35%
- 10Y*
- 24.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.68%
TIMB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -11.70%
- 6M
- -16.60%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 19.04%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.53M | $37.39M | $37.49M | |
TIMB TIM S.A. | $11.39M | $11.59M | $9.37M |
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 48.70% | -0.15% | 10.44% | 46.73% | -4.51% | 36.44% | 13.99% |
TIMB TIM S.A. | -0.09% | 86.96% | -33.24% | 68.57% | 4.05% | -13.46% | 23.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUSHA and TIMB is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
RUSHA:
$6.20B
TIMB:
$9.16B
RUSHA:
$3.31
TIMB:
R$9.02
RUSHA:
24.07
TIMB:
10.76
RUSHA:
3.02
TIMB:
0.64
RUSHA:
0.88
TIMB:
1.70
RUSHA:
2.75
TIMB:
1.85
RUSHA:
$7.24B
TIMB:
R$27.40B
RUSHA:
$1.37B
TIMB:
R$14.95B
RUSHA:
$535.09M
TIMB:
R$14.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUSHA vs. TIMB — Risk / Return Rank
RUSHA
TIMB
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and TIM S.A. (TIMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RUSHA | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 0.48 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 1.29 | +4.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUSHA drawdown since its inception was -71.91%, which is greater than TIMB's maximum drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHA and TIMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUSHA | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.91% | -37.08% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.81% | -31.35% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.76% | -37.08% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.27% | -37.08% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -30.92% | +28.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.46% | -12.39% | -5.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 11.68% | -2.96% |
Volatility
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) is 9.44%, while TIM S.A. (TIMB) has a volatility of 10.03%. This indicates that RUSHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUSHA | TIMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 10.03% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.53% | 25.64% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.49% | 32.07% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.65% | 31.51% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.25% | 32.10% | +1.15% |
Dividends
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Dividend Comparison
RUSHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than TIMB's 10.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 0.95% | 1.37% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.33% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 0.70% |
TIMB TIM S.A. | 10.36% | 11.67% | 6.03% | 4.98% | 4.05% | 3.43% | 3.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and TIM S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RUSHA vs. TIMB - Profitability Comparison
RUSHA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 361.67M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
TIMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TIM S.A. reported a gross profit of 3.86B and revenue of 6.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
RUSHA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.19M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
TIMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TIM S.A. reported an operating income of 1.72B and revenue of 6.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.7%.
RUSHA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 72.76M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
TIMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TIM S.A. reported a net income of 969.57M and revenue of 6.97B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RUSHA and TIMB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIMB has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to RUSHA (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSHA dropped -71.91% vs TIMB's -37.08%.
RUSHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUSHA and TIMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer