RUSHA vs. RUSHB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB).

Performance

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc.	22.88%	-0.15%	10.44%	46.73%	-4.51%	36.44%	35.37%	36.49%	-31.74%	59.28%
RUSHB Rush Enterprises, Inc.	14.71%	4.77%	4.28%	43.39%	5.93%	44.83%	26.17%	29.92%	-25.72%	56.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RUSHA : $5.25B RUSHB : $5.11B
EPS RUSHA : $3.27 RUSHB : $3.27
PE Ratio RUSHA : 20.22 RUSHB : 19.68
PEG Ratio RUSHA : 2.54 RUSHB : 2.47
PS Ratio RUSHA : 0.72 RUSHB : 0.70
PB Ratio RUSHA : 2.38 RUSHB : 2.32
Total Revenue (TTM) RUSHA : $7.43B RUSHB : $7.43B
Gross Profit (TTM) RUSHA : $1.46B RUSHB : $1.46B
EBITDA (TTM) RUSHA : $552.82M RUSHB : $552.82M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSHA achieves a 22.88% return, which is significantly higher than RUSHB's 14.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RUSHA having a 25.12% annualized return and RUSHB not far behind at 24.92%.

RUSHA

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -6.60%
• YTD: 22.88%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 25.48%
• 3Y*: 23.79%
• 5Y*: 16.52%
• 10Y*: 25.12%

RUSHB

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 14.71%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 15.39%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 18.22%
• 10Y*: 24.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RUSHA vs. RUSHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUSHA

RUSHA Risk / Return Rank: 65
RUSHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RUSHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RUSHA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RUSHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
RUSHA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

RUSHB

RUSHB Risk / Return Rank: 56
RUSHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RUSHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
RUSHB Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RUSHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RUSHB Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RUSHA	RUSHB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.47	+0.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	0.91	+0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.10	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.21	0.71	+0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	1.70	+1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RUSHA Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the RUSHB Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSHA and RUSHB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RUSHA	RUSHB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	0.47	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.53	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.65	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.27	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between RUSHA and RUSHB is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Dividend Comparison

RUSHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than RUSHB's 1.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc.	1.13%	1.37%	1.28%	1.23%	1.53%	1.33%	0.98%	1.08%	0.70%
RUSHB Rush Enterprises, Inc.	1.17%	1.32%	1.29%	1.17%	1.42%	1.37%	1.07%	1.09%	0.67%

Drawdowns

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSHA drawdown since its inception was -71.91%, smaller than the maximum RUSHB drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHA and RUSHB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RUSHA	RUSHB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.91%	-82.05%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.81%	-19.59%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.27%	-28.48%	+1.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.89%	-58.03%	+10.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.93%	-3.40%	-8.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.63%	-23.30%	+5.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.23%	8.15%	+1.08%

Volatility

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Volatility Comparison

Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) at 7.71%. This indicates that RUSHA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RUSHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RUSHA	RUSHB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.41%	7.71%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.49%	21.90%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.52%	33.22%	-0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.58%	34.57%	-3.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.35%	38.51%	-5.16%

Financials

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RUSHA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 348.48M and revenue of 1.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.7%.

RUSHB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 348.48M and revenue of 1.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.7%.

RUSHA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 91.65M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

RUSHB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 91.65M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.

RUSHA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 64.33M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

RUSHB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 64.33M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.