PortfoliosLab logo
RUSHA vs. RUSHB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between RUSHA and RUSHB is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,800.00%3,000.00%3,200.00%3,400.00%3,600.00%3,800.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,885.69%
3,185.75%
RUSHA
RUSHB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RUSHA:

0.13

RUSHB:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

RUSHA:

0.63

RUSHB:

1.26

Omega Ratio

RUSHA:

1.07

RUSHB:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

RUSHA:

0.33

RUSHB:

0.96

Martin Ratio

RUSHA:

0.80

RUSHB:

4.11

Ulcer Index

RUSHA:

10.60%

RUSHB:

6.63%

Daily Std Dev

RUSHA:

34.79%

RUSHB:

38.62%

Max Drawdown

RUSHA:

-71.91%

RUSHB:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

RUSHA:

-24.90%

RUSHB:

-10.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RUSHA:

$3.93B

RUSHB:

$4.11B

EPS

RUSHA:

$3.57

RUSHB:

$3.57

PE Ratio

RUSHA:

13.57

RUSHB:

15.80

PEG Ratio

RUSHA:

3.16

RUSHB:

2.74

PS Ratio

RUSHA:

0.51

RUSHB:

0.51

PB Ratio

RUSHA:

1.85

RUSHB:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

RUSHA:

$5.93B

RUSHB:

$5.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RUSHA:

$1.11B

RUSHB:

$1.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

RUSHA:

$495.15M

RUSHB:

$495.15M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RUSHA achieves a -11.74% return, which is significantly lower than RUSHB's -1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RUSHA has underperformed RUSHB with an annualized return of 16.01%, while RUSHB has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


RUSHA

YTD

-11.74%

1M

-9.41%

6M

-22.96%

1Y

4.60%

5Y*

24.95%

10Y*

16.01%

RUSHB

YTD

-1.60%

1M

-7.03%

6M

-3.69%

1Y

25.03%

5Y*

30.23%

10Y*

17.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RUSHA vs. RUSHB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RUSHA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RUSHA is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RUSHA is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RUSHB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RUSHB is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RUSHB is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RUSHA Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the RUSHB Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RUSHA and RUSHB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.13
0.65
RUSHA
RUSHB

Dividends

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Dividend Comparison

RUSHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than RUSHB's 1.01% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.12%1.28%1.23%1.53%1.33%0.98%1.08%0.70%
RUSHB
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
1.01%1.29%1.17%1.42%1.37%1.07%1.09%0.67%

Drawdowns

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RUSHA drawdown since its inception was -71.91%, smaller than the maximum RUSHB drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHA and RUSHB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-24.90%
-10.28%
RUSHA
RUSHB

Volatility

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Volatility Comparison

Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) have volatilities of 8.83% and 8.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.83%
8.48%
RUSHA
RUSHB

Financials

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
2.01B
2.01B
(RUSHA) Total Revenue
(RUSHB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RUSHA vs. RUSHB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

18.0%19.0%20.0%21.0%22.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
18.4%
18.4%
(RUSHA) Gross Margin
(RUSHB) Gross Margin
RUSHA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.11M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

RUSHB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.11M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.

RUSHA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.25M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

RUSHB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.25M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.6%.

RUSHA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 74.75M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

RUSHB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 74.75M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.