RUSHA vs. CCOI
RUSHA (Rush Enterprises, Inc.) and CCOI (Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. RUSHA operates in Auto & Truck Dealerships (Consumer Cyclical), while CCOI operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, RUSHA returned 23.48%/yr vs -4.73%/yr for CCOI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUSHA achieves a 31.59% return, which is significantly higher than CCOI's -31.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RUSHA has outperformed CCOI with an annualized return of 23.48%, while CCOI has yielded a comparatively lower -4.73% annualized return.
RUSHA
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 31.59%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- 1Y
- 44.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.89%
- 5Y*
- 22.00%
- 10Y*
- 23.48%
CCOI
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -19.27%
- YTD
- -31.86%
- 6M
- -34.91%
- 1Y
- -68.14%
- 3Y*
- -35.79%
- 5Y*
- -24.61%
- 10Y*
- -4.73%
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 31.59% | -0.15% | 10.44% | 46.73% | -4.51% | 36.44% | 35.37% | 36.49% | -31.74% | 59.28% |
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. | -31.86% | -70.14% | 7.19% | 41.23% | -17.20% | 27.78% | -5.33% | 51.98% | 4.25% | 14.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUSHA and CCOI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2002 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
RUSHA:
$5.64B
CCOI:
$700.38M
RUSHA:
$3.29
CCOI:
-$3.56
RUSHA:
0.78
CCOI:
0.74
RUSHA:
$7.27B
CCOI:
$948.70M
RUSHA:
$1.43B
CCOI:
$307.44M
RUSHA:
$500.50M
CCOI:
$187.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUSHA vs. CCOI — Risk / Return Rank
RUSHA
CCOI
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RUSHA | CCOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.85 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | -0.94 | +3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | -1.39 | +6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUSHA drawdown since its inception was -71.91%, smaller than the maximum CCOI drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUSHA and CCOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUSHA | CCOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.91% | -96.72% | +24.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.81% | -72.34% | +51.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.76% | -82.00% | +55.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.27% | -82.00% | +54.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.89% | -82.00% | +34.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.09% | -81.41% | +74.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.53% | -60.43% | +42.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 48.99% | -40.27% |
Volatility
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA) is 8.63%, while Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) has a volatility of 27.24%. This indicates that RUSHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUSHA | CCOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 27.24% | -18.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | 69.31% | -47.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.69% | 87.17% | -56.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.58% | 48.15% | -17.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 41.13% | -7.82% |
Dividends
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Dividend Comparison
RUSHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than CCOI's 7.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOI Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. | 7.33% | 14.15% | 5.09% | 4.94% | 6.23% | 4.33% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 4.69% | 3.97% | 3.65% | 4.21% |
RUSHA Rush Enterprises, Inc. | 1.08% | 1.37% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.53% | 1.33% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Enterprises, Inc. and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RUSHA vs. CCOI - Profitability Comparison
RUSHA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 343.80M and revenue of 1.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.4%.
CCOI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.96M and revenue of 239.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.0%.
RUSHA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of 82.21M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
CCOI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.51M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.
RUSHA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of 61.45M and revenue of 1.68B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.
CCOI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -39.54M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RUSHA and CCOI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CCOI has higher volatility (27.24%) compared to RUSHA (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RUSHA dropped -71.91% vs CCOI's -96.72%.
RUSHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RUSHA and CCOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer