BKTI vs. EAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT).

Performance

BKTI vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BKTI vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKTI BK Technologies Corporation	2.04%	117.53%	180.39%	-26.33%	44.63%	-19.08%	1.51%	-16.07%	7.84%	-22.65%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	-0.12%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Fundamentals

EPS BKTI : $3.45 EAT : $14.76
PE Ratio BKTI : 22.08 EAT : 9.71
PEG Ratio BKTI : 0.03 EAT : 0.22
PS Ratio BKTI : 3.47 EAT : 0.78
Total Revenue (TTM) BKTI : $86.14M EAT : $5.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) BKTI : $42.03M EAT : $2.64B
EBITDA (TTM) BKTI : $15.99M EAT : $752.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKTI achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, BKTI has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 14.62%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.55% annualized return.

BKTI

• 1D: 1.98%
• 1M: -12.13%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: -4.52%
• 1Y: 92.88%
• 3Y*: 74.80%
• 5Y*: 28.67%
• 10Y*: 14.62%

EAT

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: -5.01%
• 3Y*: 55.67%
• 5Y*: 14.79%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BKTI vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKTI

BKTI Risk / Return Rank: 80
BKTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BKTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
BKTI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BKTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BKTI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKTI vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	-0.11	+1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	0.18	+2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.02	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	-0.09	+2.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.76	-0.19	+6.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKTI vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKTI and EAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	-0.11	+1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.31	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.25	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.28	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between BKTI and EAT is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BKTI vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKTI nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKTI BK Technologies Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.61%	2.49%	3.30%	1.94%	2.13%	4.23%	5.68%	0.00%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%

Drawdowns

BKTI vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKTI drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTI and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.29%	-88.40%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.80%	-44.41%	+11.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.09%	-69.36%	+3.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.46%	-84.94%	+7.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.96%	-24.21%	+9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.87%	-24.34%	-32.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.91%	19.81%	-5.90%

Volatility

BKTI vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) have volatilities of 14.05% and 14.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.05%	14.11%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.38%	32.57%	+3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.85%	47.16%	+28.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.96%	48.38%	+21.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.14%	54.54%	+10.60%

Financials

BKTI vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BK Technologies Corporation and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BKTI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BK Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 10.85M and revenue of 21.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.5%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.5%.

BKTI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BK Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 4.23M and revenue of 21.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 168.40M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

BKTI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BK Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 4.23M and revenue of 21.51M, resulting in a net margin of 19.7%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 128.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.