BKTI vs. EAT

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

BKTI (BK Technologies Corporation) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. BKTI operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, BKTI returned 14.94%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for EAT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BKTI vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKTI achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 29.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BKTI has underperformed EAT with an annualized return of 14.94%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.91% annualized return.

BKTI

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 108.18%
• 3Y*: 76.42%
• 5Y*: 42.02%
• 10Y*: 14.94%

EAT

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 16.28%
• 6M: 15.78%
• YTD: 29.08%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 69.47%
• 5Y*: 24.92%
• 10Y*: 15.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKTI vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BKTI BK Technologies Corporation	14.32%	117.53%	180.39%	-26.33%	44.63%	-19.08%	1.51%	-16.07%	7.84%	-22.65%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	29.08%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BKTI and EAT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap BKTI : $319.27M EAT : $7.95B
EPS BKTI : $3.57 EAT : $10.20
PE Ratio BKTI : 23.87 EAT : 18.16
PEG Ratio BKTI : 0.03 EAT : 0.41
PS Ratio BKTI : 5.04 EAT : 1.47
PB Ratio BKTI : 7.16 EAT : 20.31
Total Revenue (TTM) BKTI : $67.09M EAT : $5.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) BKTI : $22.81M EAT : $3.45B
EBITDA (TTM) BKTI : $17.71M EAT : $807.20M

Return for Risk

BKTI vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKTI

BKTI Risk / Return Rank: 88
BKTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BKTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BKTI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
BKTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BKTI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 52
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 50
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKTI vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	0.24	+1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	0.69	+1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.08	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	0.29	+3.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	0.71	+8.09

BKTI vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKTI and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BKTI vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKTI drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, which is greater than EAT's maximum drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTI and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.29%	-88.40%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.95%	-38.45%	+12.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.29%	-45.92%	+5.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.98%	-63.89%	+9.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.36%	-84.94%	+7.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.05%	-2.05%	-10.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.36%	-24.31%	-32.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.45%	15.82%	-4.37%

Volatility

BKTI vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) have volatilities of 12.12% and 11.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKTI	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.12%	11.60%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.08%	35.97%	-2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.04%	47.18%	+18.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.39%	49.02%	+20.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.86%	55.20%	+9.66%

Dividends

BKTI vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKTI nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKTI BK Technologies Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.61%	2.49%	3.30%	1.94%	2.13%	4.23%	5.68%	0.00%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKTI and EAT in my portfolio?

BKTI and EAT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKTI or EAT?

BKTI has higher volatility (12.12%) compared to EAT (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKTI dropped -95.29% vs EAT's -88.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.