PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKT vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKT vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BKT has underperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 1.20%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


BKT

1D
0.86%
1M
1.91%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.55%
1Y
0.51%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-2.68%
10Y*
1.20%

FAMRX

1D
-2.05%
1M
0.33%
YTD
11.83%
6M
11.15%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKT vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
0.37%5.92%3.33%7.69%-21.51%-0.44%7.36%14.91%-2.59%2.58%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
11.83%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BKT and FAMRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999

0.09

Over the past year, BKT and FAMRX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKT vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKT
BKT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKT vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKTFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.38

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.91

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

12.61

-12.43

BKT vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKT Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKT and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKT vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKT drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKT and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKTFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.86%

-58.65%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

-9.33%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.31%

-15.35%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-26.00%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.70%

-30.96%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.26%

-2.11%

-15.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.76%

-12.30%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.15%

+0.78%

Volatility

BKT vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Income Trust (BKT) is 1.99%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that BKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKTFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

5.78%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

11.16%

-6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.86%

13.28%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.21%

14.81%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.74%

15.29%

-5.55%

BKT vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKT has a 2.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKT vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

BKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, more than FAMRX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKT
BlackRock Income Trust
10.01%9.53%9.19%8.69%8.35%7.31%6.80%6.82%6.48%5.15%5.09%5.89%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.97%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKT and FAMRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to BKT (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKT dropped -48.86% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKT and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer