BKSE vs. BKEM
BKSE (BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKSE is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while BKEM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKSE returned 6.89%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for BKEM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKSE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.
Performance
BKSE vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKSE achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 30.24% return.
BKSE
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 32.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BKEM
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 30.24%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- 1Y
- 57.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BKSE vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 13.03% | 13.09% | 9.56% | 22.37% | -18.44% | 16.18% | 58.04% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 30.24% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 47.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKSE and BKEM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BKSE and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
BKSE vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKSE
BKEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
BKSE
BKEM
Financial Services
BKSE
BKEM
Industrials
BKSE
BKEM
Consumer Cyclical
BKSE
BKEM
Healthcare
BKSE
BKEM
Energy
BKSE
BKEM
Real Estate
BKSE
BKEM
Basic Materials
BKSE
BKEM
Utilities
BKSE
BKEM
Consumer Defensive
BKSE
BKEM
Communication Services
BKSE
BKEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKSE vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
BKSE
BKEM
BKSE vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKSE | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.52 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 4.39 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 16.85 | -4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKSE | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.95 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
BKSE vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKSE drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKSE and BKEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKSE | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.08% | -39.48% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.40% | -13.11% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.76% | -18.38% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.08% | -36.53% | +7.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.95% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -16.00% | +6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 3.41% | -0.72% |
Volatility
BKSE vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) is 4.47%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that BKSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKSE | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 8.10% | -3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 16.75% | -4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 19.46% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.43% | 18.73% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 19.12% | +3.18% |
BKSE vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKSE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKSE vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than BKEM's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.45% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.17% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKSE and BKEM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKEM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKSE dropped -29.08% vs BKEM's -39.48%.
On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.37% vs 6.89% for BKSE. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.16% for BKSE.
BKSE is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BKEM is Asia Pacific Equities. BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKSE and 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKSE and BKEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer