PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKSE vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKSE vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKSE achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 30.24% return.


BKSE

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.60%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.11%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*

BKEM

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.75%
YTD
30.24%
6M
32.64%
1Y
57.21%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKSE vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
13.03%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%58.04%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
30.24%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%47.53%

Correlation

The correlation between BKSE and BKEM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.60

The correlation between BKSE and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKSE vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKSE
BKEM

Technology

16.8%
35.9%

Financial Services

16.4%
18.9%

Industrials

15.4%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%
9.7%

Healthcare

11.4%
3.2%

Energy

7.0%
4.0%

Real Estate

6.6%
1.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
6.4%

Utilities

3.4%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
6.6%

Technology

BKSE
16.8%
BKEM
35.9%

Financial Services

BKSE
16.4%
BKEM
18.9%

Industrials

BKSE
15.4%
BKEM
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

BKSE
13.3%
BKEM
9.7%

Healthcare

BKSE
11.4%
BKEM
3.2%

Energy

BKSE
7.0%
BKEM
4.0%

Real Estate

BKSE
6.6%
BKEM
1.2%

Basic Materials

BKSE
4.5%
BKEM
6.4%

Utilities

BKSE
3.4%
BKEM
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

BKSE
3.2%
BKEM
2.9%

Communication Services

BKSE
2.2%
BKEM
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKSE vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKSE vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKSEBKEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.52

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

4.39

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.15

16.85

-4.69

BKSE vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is lower than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKSE and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKSEBKEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.95

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.40

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.75

-0.02

Drawdowns

BKSE vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKSE drawdown since its inception was -29.08%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKSE and BKEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKSEBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.08%

-39.48%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-13.11%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.76%

-18.38%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.08%

-36.53%

+7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.95%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-16.00%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.41%

-0.72%

Volatility

BKSE vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) is 4.47%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that BKSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKSEBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

8.10%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

16.75%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

19.46%

-1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

18.73%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

19.12%

+3.18%

BKSE vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKSE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKSE vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

BKSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than BKEM's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.45%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKSE and BKEM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKSE dropped -29.08% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.37% vs 6.89% for BKSE. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.16% for BKSE.

BKSE is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BKEM is Asia Pacific Equities. BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKSE and 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKSE and BKEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer