BKNU vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BKNU (T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. BKNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

BKNU vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BKNU

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: 20.04%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNU vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF	-39.53%	-10.92%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	20.04%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNU and COTG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

BKNU vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKNU	COTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.21	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BKNU	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-21.71%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-8.42%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BKNU	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	40.63%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	40.63%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	40.63%	—

BKNU vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKNU vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKNU nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKNU and COTG in my portfolio?

BKNU and COTG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BKNU or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKNU or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BKNU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKNU or COTG?

BKNU and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BKNU and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BKNU and 0.75% for COTG.