PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKNU vs. CORD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKNU vs. CORD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKNU

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CORD

1D
10.23%
1M
-17.14%
YTD
-87.55%
6M
-84.49%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKNU vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BKNU
T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF
-39.53%-15.12%
CORD
T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF
-87.55%53.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BKNU and CORD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKNU vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BKNU vs. CORD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKNU vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKNUCORDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.48%

Volatility

BKNU vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKNUCORDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

185.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

185.33%

BKNU vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKNU and CORD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

BKNU vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BKNU nor CORD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BKNU and CORD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKNU and CORD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

BKNU and CORD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BKNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CORD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKNU and CORD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer