BKNU vs. CORD
BKNU (T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF) and CORD (T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while CORD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BKNU vs. CORD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKNU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORD
- 1D
- 10.23%
- 1M
- -17.14%
- YTD
- -87.55%
- 6M
- -84.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKNU vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | -39.53% | -15.12% |
CORD T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | -87.55% | 53.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKNU and CORD is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKNU vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKNU vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKNU | CORD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -93.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -91.88% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -58.48% | — |
Volatility
BKNU vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKNU | CORD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 185.33% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 185.33% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 185.33% | — |
BKNU vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BKNU and CORD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
BKNU vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BKNU nor CORD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BKNU and CORD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKNU and CORD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
BKNU and CORD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BKNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CORD is Inverse Equities.
Find the right allocation for BKNU and CORD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer