BKNU vs. MSTK
BKNU (T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF) and MSTK (Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while MSTK is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSTK.
Performance
BKNU vs. MSTK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKNU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTK
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKNU vs. MSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | -39.53% | 0.70% |
MSTK Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF | -20.94% | -47.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKNU and MSTK is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKNU vs. MSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF (BKNU) and Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKNU vs. MSTK - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility
BKNU vs. MSTK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
BKNU vs. MSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTK's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKNU vs. MSTK - Dividend Comparison
BKNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BKNU T-Rex 2X Long BKNG Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTK Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF | 49.03% | 26.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKNU and MSTK have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSTK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BKNU.
MSTK has the higher dividend yield at 49.03%, compared with 0.00% for BKNU.
BKNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTK is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BKNU and 0.99% for MSTK.
Find the right allocation for BKNU and MSTK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer