CORD vs. AXUP
CORD (T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF) and AXUP (T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while AXUP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
CORD vs. AXUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CORD
- 1D
- 8.79%
- 1M
- -19.07%
- YTD
- -89.12%
- 6M
- -91.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AXUP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORD vs. AXUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORD T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | -89.12% | 44.68% |
AXUP T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF | -34.20% | -41.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORD and AXUP is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORD vs. AXUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CORD | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CORD vs. AXUP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORD | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.12% | — | — |
Volatility
CORD vs. AXUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORD | AXUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 187.57% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 187.57% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 187.57% | — | — |
CORD vs. AXUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CORD and AXUP have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
CORD vs. AXUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CORD nor AXUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CORD and AXUP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CORD and AXUP have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
CORD and AXUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CORD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AXUP is Leveraged Equities.
Find the right allocation for CORD and AXUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer