PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORD vs. AXUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORD vs. AXUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CORD

1D
8.79%
1M
-19.07%
YTD
-89.12%
6M
-91.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AXUP

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORD vs. AXUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CORD
T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF
-89.12%44.68%
AXUP
T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF
-34.20%-41.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CORD and AXUP is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORD vs. AXUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and T-Rex 2X Long Axon Daily Target ETF (AXUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CORD vs. AXUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CORDAXUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

Drawdowns

CORD vs. AXUP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORDAXUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.12%

Volatility

CORD vs. AXUP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORDAXUPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.57%

CORD vs. AXUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CORD and AXUP have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

CORD vs. AXUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither CORD nor AXUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CORD and AXUP have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CORD and AXUP have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

CORD and AXUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CORD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AXUP is Leveraged Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORD and AXUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer