BKMC vs. SCHM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKMC (BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BKMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index while SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKMC returned 7.85%/yr vs 8.07%/yr for SCHM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.

Performance

BKMC vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 19.05% return.

BKMC

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.40%
• 1Y: 23.02%
• 3Y*: 16.09%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: —

SCHM

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 32.45%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: 8.07%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMC vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	11.31%	8.74%	13.78%	17.50%	-16.03%	23.83%	45.93%
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	19.05%	10.17%	11.98%	16.69%	-17.07%	19.36%	49.35%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and SCHM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020	0.97

The correlation between BKMC and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKMC vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKMC	SCHM
Industrials	22.9%	21.4%
Technology	16.2%	22.0%
Financial Services	12.4%	11.3%
Healthcare	11.4%	10.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.3%
Real Estate	7.6%	6.5%
Basic Materials	4.6%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	3.8%
Communication Services	3.5%	2.6%
Energy	3.3%	3.6%
Utilities	2.4%	3.0%

Return for Risk

BKMC vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC

BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 46
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

SCHM

SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 65
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKMC	SCHM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.09	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	2.94	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	3.50	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	14.11	-5.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKMC vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKMC	SCHM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	2.09	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.41	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.59	+0.23

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and SCHM.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKMC	SCHM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.02%	-42.43%	+17.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-9.32%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.68%	-23.27%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.02%	-26.46%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.03%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-5.66%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	2.31%	+0.24%

Volatility

BKMC vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is 4.16%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that BKMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKMC	SCHM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.16%	4.72%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.93%	11.74%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	15.62%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.77%	19.56%	-0.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.16%	20.46%	-1.30%

BKMC vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BKMC and SCHM have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BKMC vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SCHM's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKMC BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF	1.38%	1.35%	1.54%	1.38%	1.63%	1.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF	1.22%	1.46%	1.43%	1.50%	1.67%	1.13%	1.31%	1.48%	1.56%	1.27%	1.51%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKMC and SCHM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BKMC and SCHM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BKMC or SCHM?

SCHM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BKMC (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

Which ETF is better, BKMC or SCHM?

On 5-year performance, SCHM leads with 8.07% vs 7.85% for BKMC. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKMC or SCHM?

Over the 5-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 8.07% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKMC or SCHM?

BKMC and SCHM have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKMC or SCHM?

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.

What is the main difference between BKMC and SCHM?

BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Charles Schwab.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.