PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKMC vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKMC vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKMC achieves a 12.64% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 14.90% return.


BKMC

1D
0.75%
1M
1.61%
YTD
12.64%
6M
10.27%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
7.92%
10Y*

IWR

1D
1.35%
1M
3.20%
YTD
14.90%
6M
13.08%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
12.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKMC vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
12.64%8.74%13.78%17.50%-16.03%23.83%46.18%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
14.90%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%49.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BKMC and IWR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020

0.97

The correlation between BKMC and IWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKMC vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKMC
IWR

Industrials

22.7%
18.1%

Technology

16.6%
19.6%

Financial Services

12.7%
12.1%

Healthcare

11.7%
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.1%

Real Estate

8.2%
6.8%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.3%

Energy

3.3%
6.5%

Utilities

2.4%
5.7%

Industrials

BKMC
22.7%
IWR
18.1%

Technology

BKMC
16.6%
IWR
19.6%

Financial Services

BKMC
12.7%
IWR
12.1%

Healthcare

BKMC
11.7%
IWR
8.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BKMC
10.2%
IWR
11.1%

Real Estate

BKMC
8.2%
IWR
6.8%

Basic Materials

BKMC
4.9%
IWR
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

BKMC
3.7%
IWR
3.9%

Communication Services

BKMC
3.6%
IWR
3.3%

Energy

BKMC
3.3%
IWR
6.5%

Utilities

BKMC
2.4%
IWR
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKMC vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKMC
BKMC Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BKMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BKMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKMC vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKMCIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.83

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

10.84

-1.73

BKMC vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKMC and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKMC vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKMC drawdown since its inception was -25.02%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMC and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKMCIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.02%

-58.78%

+33.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-8.17%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.68%

-21.09%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.02%

-26.18%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-7.79%

+1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.13%

+0.43%

Volatility

BKMC vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKMCIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

4.67%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

10.51%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

13.83%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

18.30%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

19.36%

-0.22%

BKMC vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKMC has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKMC vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

BKMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than IWR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKMC
BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
1.36%1.35%1.54%1.38%1.63%1.15%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.15%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BKMC and IWR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWR has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to BKMC (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKMC dropped -25.02% vs IWR's -58.78%.

On 5-year performance, IWR leads with 8.17% vs 7.92% for BKMC. On fees, BKMC is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWR has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 7.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKMC is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.

BKMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.15% for IWR.

BKMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKMC and 0.19% for IWR.

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKMC and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer