BKIE vs. PULS
BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. BKIE is passively managed, while PULS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKIE returned 8.82%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for PULS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.
Performance
BKIE vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 1.73% return.
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PULS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 4.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 7.27% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.73% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.48% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKIE and PULS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between BKIE and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BKIE vs. PULS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKIE
PULS
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
BKIE
PULS
Industrials
BKIE
PULS
-
Technology
BKIE
PULS
-
Healthcare
BKIE
PULS
-
Consumer Cyclical
BKIE
PULS
-
Basic Materials
BKIE
PULS
-
Consumer Defensive
BKIE
PULS
-
Energy
BKIE
PULS
-
Communication Services
BKIE
PULS
-
Utilities
BKIE
PULS
-
Real Estate
BKIE
PULS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKIE vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
BKIE
PULS
BKIE vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKIE | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -30.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 7.53 | -6.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 52.00 | -50.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 314.53 | -307.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKIE | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 11.31 | -9.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 5.92 | -5.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 2.51 | -1.61 |
Drawdowns
BKIE vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKIE | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -5.85% | -22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -0.09% | -11.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | -0.34% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.19% | -0.79% | -27.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -0.02% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.09% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 0.01% | +2.95% |
Volatility
BKIE vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.11%. This indicates that BKIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKIE | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 0.11% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 0.30% | +12.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 0.41% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 0.70% | +15.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 1.33% | +15.03% |
BKIE vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BKIE vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PULS's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKIE and PULS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to PULS (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs PULS's -5.85%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 8.82% vs 4.12% for PULS. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PULS.
PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.30% for BKIE.
BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.15% for PULS.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.31 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKIE and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer