BKIE vs. PGHY
BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKIE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BKIE returned 8.82%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKIE charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PGHY.
Performance
BKIE vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BKIE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than PGHY's 2.18% return.
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 20.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
BKIE vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 7.27% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKIE and PGHY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.41 |
BKIE vs. PGHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BKIE
PGHY
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
BKIE
PGHY
Industrials
BKIE
PGHY
Technology
BKIE
PGHY
Healthcare
BKIE
PGHY
Consumer Cyclical
BKIE
PGHY
Basic Materials
BKIE
PGHY
Consumer Defensive
BKIE
PGHY
Energy
BKIE
PGHY
Communication Services
BKIE
PGHY
Utilities
BKIE
PGHY
Real Estate
BKIE
PGHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKIE vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
BKIE
PGHY
BKIE vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKIE | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.48 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 9.56 | -2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKIE | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.83 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
BKIE vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKIE | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -20.50% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.41% | -3.04% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.19% | -5.03% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.19% | -9.42% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -0.80% | -1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -1.64% | -3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 0.79% | +2.17% |
Volatility
BKIE vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) at 2.00%. This indicates that BKIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKIE | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.17% | 2.00% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 3.73% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 5.06% | +9.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 5.45% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 7.04% | +9.32% |
BKIE vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PGHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKIE vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKIE and PGHY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKIE has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 8.82% vs 4.49% for PGHY. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 3.30% for BKIE.
BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PGHY is High Yield Bonds. BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index, while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BKIE and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer