PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKIE vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKIE vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BKIE having a 8.78% return and EDIV slightly higher at 9.11%.


BKIE

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.34%
6M
5.02%
YTD
8.78%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.64%

EDIV

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.79%
6M
6.50%
YTD
9.11%
1Y
13.09%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
8.40%
ALL TIME*
3.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKIE vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
8.78%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
9.11%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%23.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BKIE and EDIV is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.70

The correlation between BKIE and EDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BKIE vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKIE
EDIV

Financial Services

26.6%
30.3%

Industrials

17.9%
9.2%

Technology

11.7%
9.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
11.9%

Basic Materials

6.7%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
13.2%

Energy

5.0%
3.2%

Communication Services

4.1%
14.0%

Utilities

3.5%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
3.3%

Financial Services

BKIE
26.6%
EDIV
30.3%

Industrials

BKIE
17.9%
EDIV
9.2%

Technology

BKIE
11.7%
EDIV
9.7%

Healthcare

BKIE
9.1%
EDIV
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BKIE
7.2%
EDIV
11.9%

Basic Materials

BKIE
6.7%
EDIV
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

BKIE
6.3%
EDIV
13.2%

Energy

BKIE
5.0%
EDIV
3.2%

Communication Services

BKIE
4.1%
EDIV
14.0%

Utilities

BKIE
3.5%
EDIV
2.4%

Real Estate

BKIE
1.8%
EDIV
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKIE vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKIE vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKIEEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.27

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

3.70

+3.54

BKIE vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKIE and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKIE vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKIE drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKIE and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKIEEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-53.36%

+25.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-10.36%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-13.84%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

-28.32%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-1.64%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-19.23%

+14.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.54%

-0.57%

Volatility

BKIE vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) have volatilities of 3.70% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKIEEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.83%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.03%

11.05%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

12.80%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

13.94%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

17.30%

-0.98%

BKIE vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKIE has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKIE vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

BKIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than EDIV's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.23%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.16%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKIE and EDIV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BKIE (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKIE dropped -28.19% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 5-year performance, EDIV leads with 12.20% vs 9.60% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EDIV has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.23% for BKIE.

BKIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EDIV is Emerging Markets Equities. BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BKIE and 0.49% for EDIV.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKIE and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer