PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKGI vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKGI vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKGI vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
10.41%37.53%12.35%9.72%8.54%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
5.83%30.55%7.53%8.68%10.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKGI achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than BKEM's 5.83% return.


BKGI

1D
1.11%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
10.41%
6M
15.93%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
10Y*

BKEM

1D
3.62%
1M
-8.93%
YTD
5.83%
6M
9.17%
1Y
33.56%
3Y*
15.90%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKGI vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKGI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKGI vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKGI
BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKGI vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKGIBKEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.68

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

2.26

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

2.53

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.90

9.54

+6.37

BKGI vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKGI Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKGI and BKEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKGIBKEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.68

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.58

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between BKGI and BKEM is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKGI vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

BKGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than BKEM's 2.13% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKGI
Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
2.40%2.65%4.55%4.55%0.53%0.00%0.00%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.13%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%

Drawdowns

BKGI vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKGI drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKGI and BKEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKGIBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-39.48%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.35%

-13.11%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-9.96%

+6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-16.41%

+13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

3.48%

-1.44%

Volatility

BKGI vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is 4.74%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.47%. This indicates that BKGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKGIBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

10.47%

-5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

14.67%

-6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.67%

20.07%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

18.32%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

18.88%

-4.81%