PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKEM vs. VEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKEM vs. VEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 22.14% return, which is significantly higher than VEXC's 19.19% return.


BKEM

1D
1.71%
1M
-3.22%
6M
16.09%
YTD
22.14%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*

VEXC

1D
0.27%
1M
0.35%
6M
15.63%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKEM vs. VEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and VEXC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKEM vs. VEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VEXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. VEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (VEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKEMVEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

BKEM vs. VEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. VEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than VEXC's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and VEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKEMVEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-12.42%

-27.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.51%

-4.51%

-3.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.80%

-2.34%

-13.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

Volatility

BKEM vs. VEXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKEMVEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.93%

20.15%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.51%

20.15%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

20.15%

-0.50%

BKEM vs. VEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VEXC's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKEM vs. VEXC - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than VEXC's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.92%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
VEXC
Vanguard Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.44%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKEM and VEXC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEXC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEXC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 1.44% for VEXC.

BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while VEXC tracks FTSE Emerging ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.07% for VEXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKEM and VEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer