BKEM vs. MKOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. BKEM is passively managed, while MKOR is actively managed. Over the past year, BKEM returned 57.21% vs 187.66% for MKOR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BKEM charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MKOR.

Performance

BKEM vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 96.84% return.

BKEM

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 8.75%
• YTD: 30.24%
• 6M: 32.64%
• 1Y: 57.21%
• 3Y*: 24.11%
• 5Y*: 7.37%
• 10Y*: —

MKOR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 16.82%
• YTD: 96.84%
• 6M: 107.34%
• 1Y: 187.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKEM vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	30.24%	30.55%	7.53%	-0.30%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	96.84%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and MKOR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.76

The correlation between BKEM and MKOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKEM vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BKEM	MKOR
Technology	35.9%	56.1%
Financial Services	18.9%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	7.0%
Industrials	9.0%	15.0%
Communication Services	6.6%	2.1%
Basic Materials	6.4%	0.8%
Energy	4.0%	0.6%
Healthcare	3.2%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.7%
Utilities	2.3%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

BKEM vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 84
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BKEM	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	5.08	-2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	4.94	-1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.70	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.39	9.16	-4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.85	35.31	-18.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BKEM vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is lower than the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKEM and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BKEM	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	5.08	-2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.57	-0.82

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and MKOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BKEM	MKOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.48%	-22.09%	-17.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.11%	-20.62%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-2.27%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.00%	-6.22%	-9.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	5.34%	-1.93%

Volatility

BKEM vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) is 8.10%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that BKEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BKEM	MKOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	17.87%	-9.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.75%	33.29%	-16.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	37.15%	-17.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.73%	27.06%	-8.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	27.06%	-7.94%

BKEM vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

BKEM vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than MKOR's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.45%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.33%	2.62%	5.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BKEM and MKOR in my portfolio?

BKEM and MKOR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BKEM or MKOR?

MKOR has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to BKEM (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKEM dropped -39.48% vs MKOR's -22.09%.

Which ETF is better, BKEM or MKOR?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 187.66% vs 57.21% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BKEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BKEM or MKOR?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 187.66% return vs 57.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BKEM or MKOR?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BKEM or MKOR?

BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.33% for MKOR.

What is the main difference between BKEM and MKOR?

They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.79% for MKOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.