PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKEM vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKEM vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 30.24% return, which is significantly higher than BKSE's 13.03% return.


BKEM

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.75%
YTD
30.24%
6M
32.64%
1Y
57.21%
3Y*
24.11%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*

BKSE

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.60%
YTD
13.03%
6M
12.11%
1Y
32.65%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKEM vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
30.24%30.55%7.53%8.68%-19.43%-3.91%47.53%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
13.03%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%58.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and BKSE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.60

The correlation between BKEM and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

BKEM vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BKEM
BKSE

Technology

35.9%
16.8%

Financial Services

18.9%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
13.3%

Industrials

9.0%
15.4%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.2%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.5%

Energy

4.0%
7.0%

Healthcare

3.2%
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
3.2%

Utilities

2.3%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.2%
6.6%

Technology

BKEM
35.9%
BKSE
16.8%

Financial Services

BKEM
18.9%
BKSE
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BKEM
9.7%
BKSE
13.3%

Industrials

BKEM
9.0%
BKSE
15.4%

Communication Services

BKEM
6.6%
BKSE
2.2%

Basic Materials

BKEM
6.4%
BKSE
4.5%

Energy

BKEM
4.0%
BKSE
7.0%

Healthcare

BKEM
3.2%
BKSE
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

BKEM
2.9%
BKSE
3.2%

Utilities

BKEM
2.3%
BKSE
3.4%

Real Estate

BKEM
1.2%
BKSE
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKEM vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKEMBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.32

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

3.49

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.85

12.15

+4.69

BKEM vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKEM and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKEMBKSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

1.87

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.32

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.73

+0.02

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKEMBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-29.08%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-9.40%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.38%

-26.76%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-29.08%

-7.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.11%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-9.06%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.69%

+0.72%

Volatility

BKEM vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.47%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKEMBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

4.47%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

11.96%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

17.63%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

21.43%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.12%

22.30%

-3.18%

BKEM vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKEM vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than BKSE's 1.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.45%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.16%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKEM and BKSE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKEM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKEM dropped -39.48% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.37% vs 6.89% for BKSE. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for BKEM.

BKEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 1.16% for BKSE.

BKEM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BKSE is Small Cap Growth Equities. BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BKEM and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKEM and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer