PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKEM vs. BKDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKEM vs. BKDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKEM vs. BKDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
6.61%30.55%-4.21%
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
2.55%18.58%-0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKEM achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly higher than BKDV's 2.55% return.


BKEM

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.07%
YTD
6.61%
6M
9.15%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*

BKDV

1D
0.34%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
2.55%
6M
7.74%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKEM vs. BKDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKEM has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BKDV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKEM vs. BKDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

BKDV
BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKEM vs. BKDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKEMBKDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.70

1.11

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.58

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.52

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.80

6.67

+3.13

BKEM vs. BKDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the BKDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKEM and BKDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKEMBKDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.11

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BKEM and BKDV is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKEM vs. BKDV - Dividend Comparison

BKEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than BKDV's 0.60% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.77%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
0.60%0.62%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BKEM vs. BKDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKEM drawdown since its inception was -39.48%, which is greater than BKDV's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKEM and BKDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKEMBKDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.48%

-15.49%

-23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.11%

-12.07%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.29%

-4.37%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.41%

-2.60%

-13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

2.76%

+0.77%

Volatility

BKEM vs. BKDV - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) at 4.53%. This indicates that BKEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKEMBKDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

4.53%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

9.09%

+5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.08%

16.86%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

16.03%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

16.03%

+2.84%