PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKDV vs. BKLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKDV vs. BKLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKDV vs. BKLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
2.21%18.58%-0.91%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
-4.58%18.06%3.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 2.21% return, which is significantly higher than BKLC's -4.58% return.


BKDV

1D
2.10%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
2.21%
6M
7.34%
1Y
18.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKLC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.99%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKDV vs. BKLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BKLC's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKDV vs. BKLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV
BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLC
BKLC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BKLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. BKLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKDVBKLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.53

1.53

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.55

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

7.24

-0.27

BKDV vs. BKLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the BKLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and BKLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKDVBKLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.02

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.98

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and BKLC is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BKDV vs. BKLC - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BKLC's 1.11% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
0.60%0.62%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BKLC
BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF
1.11%1.05%1.22%1.35%1.64%1.10%0.84%

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. BKLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum BKLC drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and BKLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKDVBKLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-26.14%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-12.05%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-6.40%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-5.40%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.58%

+0.16%

Volatility

BKDV vs. BKLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is 4.62%, while BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that BKDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKDVBKLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

5.41%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

9.69%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

18.48%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

17.18%

-1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

17.59%

-1.54%