PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKDV vs. BKEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BKDV vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BKDV vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
2.55%18.58%-0.91%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
6.61%30.55%-4.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKDV achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 6.61% return.


BKDV

1D
0.34%
1M
-3.53%
YTD
2.55%
6M
7.74%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKEM

1D
0.74%
1M
-7.07%
YTD
6.61%
6M
9.15%
1Y
34.00%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BKDV vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKDV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BKDV vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKDV
BKDV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BKDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BKDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BKEM
BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKDV vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKDVBKEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.11

1.70

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

2.28

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.64

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.67

9.80

-3.13

BKDV vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKDV and BKEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKDVBKEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.70

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.59

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between BKDV and BKEM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BKDV vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

BKDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than BKEM's 1.77% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BKDV
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF
0.60%0.62%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BKEM
BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.77%2.25%2.76%3.02%3.15%2.22%1.78%

Drawdowns

BKDV vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKDV drawdown since its inception was -15.49%, smaller than the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKDV and BKEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BKDVBKEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-39.48%

+23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.07%

-13.11%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-9.29%

+4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-16.41%

+13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.53%

-0.77%

Volatility

BKDV vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is 4.53%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 9.18%. This indicates that BKDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BKDVBKEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

9.18%

-4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

14.68%

-5.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.86%

20.08%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

18.31%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.03%

18.87%

-2.84%