BKCI vs. BKMI
BKCI (BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF) and BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BKCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BKCI charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BKMI.
Performance
BKCI vs. BKMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKCI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 4.73%
- 1Y
- 6.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKMI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCI vs. BKMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | -0.39% |
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKCI and BKMI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKCI vs. BKMI — Risk / Return Rank
BKCI
BKMI
BKCI vs. BKMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKCI | BKMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKCI | BKMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.23 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
BKCI vs. BKMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than BKMI's maximum drawdown of -2.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and BKMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKCI | BKMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.03% | -2.99% | -28.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -1.23% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -1.17% | -8.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | — | — |
Volatility
BKCI vs. BKMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKCI | BKMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 2.88% | +11.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 2.88% | +13.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 2.88% | +13.73% |
BKCI vs. BKMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKCI vs. BKMI - Dividend Comparison
BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than BKMI's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF | 1.34% | 1.39% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.46% |
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKCI and BKMI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.
BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.
BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKMI is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.35% for BKMI.
Find the right allocation for BKCI and BKMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer