PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKCI vs. BKMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKCI vs. BKMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BKCI

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.93%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.73%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

BKMI

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BKCI vs. BKMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BKCI and BKMI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKCI vs. BKMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BKCI
BKCI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BKCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BKCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BKMI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BKCI vs. BKMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) and BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BKCIBKMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

BKCI vs. BKMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BKCIBKMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.23

-0.14

Drawdowns

BKCI vs. BKMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKCI drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, which is greater than BKMI's maximum drawdown of -2.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKCI and BKMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKCIBKMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-2.99%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.23%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-1.17%

-8.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

Volatility

BKCI vs. BKMI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKCIBKMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

2.88%

+11.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

2.88%

+13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

2.88%

+13.73%

BKCI vs. BKMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKCI has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BKMI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BKCI vs. BKMI - Dividend Comparison

BKCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than BKMI's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BKCI
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF
1.34%1.39%0.78%0.73%0.46%
BKMI
BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF
0.98%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKCI and BKMI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BKCI.

BKCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.98% for BKMI.

BKCI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BKMI is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BKCI and 0.35% for BKMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKCI and BKMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer