BKMI vs. ERX
BKMI (BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BKMI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by BNY Mellon, while ERX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (200%). BKMI is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BKMI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for ERX.
Performance
BKMI vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BKMI
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 34.28%
- YTD
- 66.56%
- 1Y
- 81.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 36.03%
- 10Y*
- -9.07%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.27M | $1.91M | $2.41M | |
| $21.45M | $22.83M | $28.29M |
BKMI vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | -0.85% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 53.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BKMI and ERX is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | -0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BKMI vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
BKMI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERX
BKMI vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF (BKMI) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BKMI | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BKMI vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKMI drawdown since its inception was -2.99%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKMI and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKMI | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -99.54% | +96.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -91.59% | +89.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -67.25% | +66.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility
BKMI vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BKMI | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97% | 42.28% | -39.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 51.50% | -48.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 68.84% | -65.87% |
BKMI vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKMI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
BKMI vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
BKMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than ERX's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKMI BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.53% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BKMI and ERX have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for ERX.
BKMI has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.53% for ERX.
BKMI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while ERX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BKMI and 0.91% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for BKMI and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer