BJAN vs. AIOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BJAN (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. BJAN is passively managed, while AIOO is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

BJAN vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.38% return.

BJAN

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 7.20%
• 6M: 8.74%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 17.37%
• 5Y*: 10.74%
• 10Y*: —

AIOO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.98%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJAN vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January	7.20%	9.68%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.38%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BJAN and AIOO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

BJAN vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJAN

BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 82
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJAN vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BJAN	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.89	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BJAN	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	2.80	-1.89

Drawdowns

BJAN vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJAN	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.86%	-0.74%	-26.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.09%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.91%	-0.17%	-2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BJAN	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.70%	1.98%	+5.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.97%	1.98%	+9.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.06%	1.98%	+12.08%

BJAN vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

BJAN vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BJAN nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BJAN Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJAN and AIOO in my portfolio?

BJAN and AIOO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BJAN or AIOO?

On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BJAN or AIOO?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BJAN or AIOO?

BJAN and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BJAN and AIOO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJAN and 0.64% for AIOO.