PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BJAN vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BJAN vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJAN achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


BJAN

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.97%
YTD
7.04%
6M
8.66%
1Y
20.54%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJAN vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
7.04%14.81%17.36%23.66%-11.40%13.86%12.54%20.73%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BJAN and VTI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.94

The correlation between BJAN and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

BJAN vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BJAN
VTI

Technology

36.2%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.2%

Industrials

8.1%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

BJAN
36.2%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

BJAN
11.9%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

BJAN
10.9%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

BJAN
10.1%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

BJAN
8.4%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

BJAN
8.1%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

BJAN
4.9%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

BJAN
3.5%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

BJAN
2.3%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

BJAN
1.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

BJAN
1.8%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BJAN vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJAN
BJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJAN vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BJANVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.68

2.33

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.77

3.18

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.42

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.17

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.66

14.62

+2.04

BJAN vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJAN and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BJANVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

2.33

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.73

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.51

+0.41

Drawdowns

BJAN vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJAN drawdown since its inception was -26.86%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJAN and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BJANVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.86%

-55.45%

+28.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-8.92%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.81%

-19.30%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.38%

-25.36%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-0.72%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-8.03%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.93%

-0.69%

Volatility

BJAN vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) is 1.43%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that BJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BJANVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

2.96%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

9.13%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.72%

12.17%

-4.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

17.40%

-5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

18.30%

-4.23%

BJAN vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

BJAN vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

BJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BJAN
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BJAN and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to BJAN (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJAN dropped -26.86% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 10.70% for BJAN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BJAN has been the lower-risk option at 1.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 10.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJAN.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for BJAN.

BJAN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. BJAN tracks S&P 500, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJAN and 0.03% for VTI.

BJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BJAN and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer