BIZD vs. XYLD
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.66%/yr vs 8.33%/yr for XYLD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
BIZD vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -9.43% return, which is significantly lower than XYLD's 5.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 7.66%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.33% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- -9.43%
- 6M
- -8.46%
- 1Y
- -13.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
BIZD vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -9.43% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 5.52% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and XYLD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.49 |
The correlation between BIZD and XYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BIZD vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIZD
XYLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BIZD
XYLD
Basic Materials
BIZD
-
XYLD
Communication Services
BIZD
-
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
BIZD
-
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
BIZD
-
XYLD
Energy
BIZD
-
XYLD
Healthcare
BIZD
-
XYLD
Industrials
BIZD
-
XYLD
Real Estate
BIZD
-
XYLD
Technology
BIZD
-
XYLD
Utilities
BIZD
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
XYLD
BIZD vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIZD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.59 | -0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 3.27 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 17.16 | -18.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -33.46% | -21.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -5.29% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -15.53% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -18.66% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -33.46% | -21.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.66% | 0.00% | -19.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -3.71% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.18% | 1.01% | +12.17% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 5.51% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 2.21%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 2.21% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | 5.76% | +9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 6.80% | +11.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 11.26% | +6.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 14.22% | +7.55% |
BIZD vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.94%, more than XYLD's 10.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.94% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.46% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and XYLD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.51%) compared to XYLD (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.33% vs 7.66% for BIZD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.94%, compared with 10.46% for XYLD.
BIZD is categorized as Financials Equities, while XYLD is Derivative Income. BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer