PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BIZD vs. IYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BIZD vs. IYF

Last updated Jul 14, 2026
Documentation

BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - BIZD tracks the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index while IYF tracks the Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.49%/yr vs 13.56%/yr for IYF. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIZD charges 12.86%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYF.

Performance

BIZD vs. IYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's 4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed IYF with an annualized return of 7.49%, while IYF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.56% annualized return.

BIZD

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.00%
6M
-7.77%
YTD
-6.86%
1Y
-15.51%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
7.49%

IYF

1D
0.26%
1M
4.41%
6M
2.51%
YTD
4.21%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
12.04%
10Y*
13.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF		-6.86%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF		4.21%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and IYF is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013

0.61

The correlation between BIZD and IYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BIZD vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
BIZD
IYF

Financial Services

100.0%
99.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BIZD
100.0%
IYF
99.1%

Basic Materials

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Communication Services

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Consumer Cyclical

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Consumer Defensive

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Energy

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Healthcare

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Industrials

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Real Estate

BIZD

-

IYF
0.6%

Technology

BIZD

-

IYF
0.3%

Utilities

BIZD

-

IYF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck BDC Income ETF

iShares U.S. Financials ETF

Often compared with BIZD:
BIZD vs. PBDCBIZD vs. ARCCBIZD vs. CEFSBIZD vs. PSPBIZD vs. PEXBIZD vs. PFLTBIZD vs. HYIN
Often compared with IYF:
IYF vs. XLFIYF vs. VFHIYF vs. IYGIYF vs. KBWBIYF vs. KBEIYF vs. IXGIYF vs. FTXO

Return for Risk

BIZD vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BIZDIYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.84
0.79

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.12
1.16

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.14

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

0.84

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

2.26

-3.37

BIZD vs. IYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the IYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and IYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and IYF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BIZDIYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-79.09%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

-13.88%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-16.60%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-25.06%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

-42.57%

-12.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.39%

-0.24%

-17.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-17.55%

+10.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.91%

5.16%

+8.75%

Volatility

BIZD vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) at 4.24%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BIZDIYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.24%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

11.22%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.67%

14.72%

+3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

19.00%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

20.81%

+0.97%

BIZD vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 12.86% expense ratio, which is higher than IYF's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIZD vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.22%, more than IYF's 1.44% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF		12.22%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF		1.44%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

BIZD and IYF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to IYF (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs IYF's -79.09%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.56% vs 7.49% for BIZD. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.56% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYF is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 12.22%, compared with 1.44% for IYF.

BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while IYF tracks Russell 1000 Financials 40 Act 15/22.5 Daily Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 12.86% for BIZD and 0.38% for IYF.

IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIZD and IYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer