PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIZD vs. IAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIZD vs. IAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly lower than IAK's -4.56% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed IAK with an annualized return of 7.77%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.


BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%

IAK

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
-4.56%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
-4.16%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIZD vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
-4.56%9.50%28.25%11.28%11.33%26.84%-2.86%25.94%-11.48%14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BIZD and IAK is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between BIZD and IAK has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BIZD vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BIZD
IAK

Financial Services

100.0%
99.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.5%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BIZD
100.0%
IAK
99.5%

Basic Materials

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Communication Services

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Consumer Defensive

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Energy

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Healthcare

BIZD

-

IAK
0.5%

Industrials

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Real Estate

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Technology

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Utilities

BIZD

-

IAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIZD vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

IAK
IAK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIZD vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIZDIAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.55

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.03

-1.14

+0.12

BIZD vs. IAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the IAK Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIZD and IAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIZDIAKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.72

-0.28

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.56

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.26

+0.04

Drawdowns

BIZD vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and IAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIZDIAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.44%

-77.38%

+21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.22%

-7.62%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.56%

-11.58%

-10.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-14.76%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.44%

-44.95%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-5.82%

-13.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-16.13%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.63%

3.96%

+8.67%

Volatility

BIZD vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 3.82%. This indicates that BIZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIZDIAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.82%

+0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

9.98%

+4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.11%

14.77%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.07%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

20.89%

+0.85%

BIZD vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIZD has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIZD vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison

BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than IAK's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
IAK
iShares U.S. Insurance ETF
2.76%1.69%1.49%1.44%1.69%2.26%2.07%1.84%2.33%1.62%1.68%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIZD and IAK have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIZD has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to IAK (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs IAK's -77.38%.

On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 11.66% vs 7.77% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 11.66% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 2.76% for IAK.

BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BIZD and 0.43% for IAK.

IAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIZD and IAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer