BIZD vs. GDX
BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BIZD returned 7.77%/yr vs 13.98%/yr for GDX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIZD charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.
Performance
BIZD vs. GDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIZD achieves a -8.99% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BIZD has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.
BIZD
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -8.99%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- -12.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.77%
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
BIZD vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -8.99% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIZD and GDX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BIZD and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BIZD vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BIZD
GDX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
BIZD
GDX
-
Basic Materials
BIZD
-
GDX
Communication Services
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Consumer Defensive
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Energy
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Healthcare
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Industrials
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Real Estate
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Technology
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Utilities
BIZD
-
GDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIZD vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank
BIZD
GDX
BIZD vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIZD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | 1.35 | -2.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | 1.76 | -2.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.25 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.00 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 5.13 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIZD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | 1.35 | -2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.52 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.38 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.13 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
BIZD vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIZD drawdown since its inception was -55.44%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIZD and GDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIZD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.44% | -80.34% | +24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.22% | -30.84% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -30.84% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -46.51% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.44% | -49.79% | -5.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.27% | -26.62% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -40.43% | +33.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.63% | 11.99% | +0.64% |
Volatility
BIZD vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) is 4.79%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that BIZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIZD | GDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 15.40% | -10.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.77% | 37.50% | -22.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 45.49% | -27.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 36.39% | -18.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 37.18% | -15.44% |
BIZD vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIZD has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIZD vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison
BIZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.87%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 13.87% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIZD and GDX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIZD dropped -55.44% vs GDX's -80.34%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 7.77% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
BIZD is categorized as Financials Equities, while GDX is Gold. BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for BIZD and 0.51% for GDX.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIZD and GDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer