PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITY vs. BLOK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BITY vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITY achieves a -23.09% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 16.21% return.


BITY

1D
-2.61%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
-23.09%
6M
-26.69%
1Y
-37.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITY vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BITY and BLOK is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025

0.73

The correlation between BITY and BLOK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BITY vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITY
BITY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITY vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) and Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITYBLOKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.16

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

0.87

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

1.90

-3.31

BITY vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITY Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITY and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITYBLOKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.94

0.81

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.48

-1.19

Drawdowns

BITY vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITY drawdown since its inception was -46.36%, smaller than the maximum BLOK drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITY and BLOK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BITYBLOKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.36%

-73.33%

+26.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.36%

-35.64%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.49%

-10.16%

-35.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-26.08%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.48%

16.23%

+10.25%

Volatility

BITY vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) is 9.68%, while Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that BITY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BITYBLOKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

10.59%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.24%

28.55%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.94%

38.29%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

42.36%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.02%

38.97%

+0.05%

BITY vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BITY vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

BITY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.66%, more than BLOK's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITY
Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF
39.66%21.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


BITY and BLOK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to BITY (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITY dropped -46.36% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

On 1-year performance, BLOK leads with 30.79% vs -37.35% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BITY has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 30.79% return vs -37.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

BITY has the higher dividend yield at 39.66%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

BITY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BLOK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BITY and 0.71% for BLOK.

BLOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BITY and BLOK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer