BITU vs. BETE
BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) and BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Over the past year, BITU returned -73.07% vs -35.67% for BETE. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BITU vs. BETE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITU achieves a -52.92% return, which is significantly lower than BETE's -34.13% return.
BITU
- 1D
- -5.58%
- 1M
- -34.84%
- YTD
- -52.92%
- 6M
- -59.11%
- 1Y
- -73.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BETE
- 1D
- -4.17%
- 1M
- -21.37%
- YTD
- -34.13%
- 6M
- -38.03%
- 1Y
- -35.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITU vs. BETE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -52.92% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | -34.13% | -8.17% | 14.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITU and BETE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BITU and BETE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITU vs. BETE — Risk / Return Rank
BITU
BETE
BITU vs. BETE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) and Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BITU | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.92 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.63 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -1.07 | -0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BITU | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | -0.65 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.35 | 0.24 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
BITU vs. BETE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITU drawdown since its inception was -78.94%, which is greater than BETE's maximum drawdown of -56.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITU and BETE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITU | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.94% | -56.81% | -22.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.94% | -56.81% | -22.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.94% | -56.81% | -22.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -21.36% | -13.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.84% | 33.46% | +16.38% |
Volatility
BITU vs. BETE - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) at 9.55%. This indicates that BITU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITU | BETE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | 9.55% | +9.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.41% | 40.03% | +29.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.00% | 54.95% | +32.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.45% | 56.48% | +40.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.45% | 56.48% | +40.97% |
BITU vs. BETE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BITU and BETE have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BITU vs. BETE - Dividend Comparison
BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%, which matches BETE's 83.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF | 83.91% | 68.22% | 15.22% | 0.78% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 83.36% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BITU and BETE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to BETE (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITU dropped -78.94% vs BETE's -56.81%.
On 1-year performance, BETE leads with -35.67% vs -73.07% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 9.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETE has performed better with a -35.67% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITU and BETE have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BETE has the higher dividend yield at 83.91%, compared with 83.36% for BITU.
BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITU and BETE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer