PortfoliosLab logo
BETE vs. GBTC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and GBTC is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential

Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer

Try portfolio optimization now

Performance

BETE vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-13.01%
24.38%
BETE
GBTC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BETE:

-0.36

GBTC:

0.24

Sortino Ratio

BETE:

-0.15

GBTC:

0.74

Omega Ratio

BETE:

0.98

GBTC:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

BETE:

-0.49

GBTC:

0.37

Martin Ratio

BETE:

-0.99

GBTC:

0.83

Ulcer Index

BETE:

21.27%

GBTC:

15.87%

Daily Std Dev

BETE:

58.45%

GBTC:

55.57%

Max Drawdown

BETE:

-42.67%

GBTC:

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

BETE:

-41.54%

GBTC:

-21.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -30.76% return, which is significantly lower than GBTC's -10.40% return.


BETE

YTD

-30.76%

1M

-13.39%

6M

-2.68%

1Y

-23.08%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

GBTC

YTD

-10.40%

1M

-7.32%

6M

33.49%

1Y

8.65%

5Y*

54.88%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BETE vs. GBTC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BETE is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BETE is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BETE is 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BETE is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BETE is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BETE is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GBTC is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GBTC is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GBTC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GBTC is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BETE vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BETE, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BETE: -0.53
GBTC: 0.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for BETE, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
BETE: -0.46
GBTC: 0.43
The chart of Omega ratio for BETE, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
BETE: 0.94
GBTC: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for BETE, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
BETE: -0.65
GBTC: 0.03
The chart of Martin ratio for BETE, currently valued at -1.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
BETE: -1.45
GBTC: 0.06

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and GBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.53
0.02
BETE
GBTC

Dividends

BETE vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.24%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
BETE
Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF
25.98%15.22%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%

Drawdowns

BETE vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -42.67%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and GBTC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-47.71%
-27.29%
BETE
GBTC

Volatility

BETE vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 22.04% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) (GBTC) at 18.80%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
22.04%
18.80%
BETE
GBTC

User Portfolios with BETE or GBTC


GOOGL
AMZN
AEE
AEP
AFG
ADI
META
FR
FI
GILD
INTU
JPM
ORLY
ORCL
PAYX
PM
PG
PGR
AAPL
AMAT
ADP
AZO
BAC
BKNG
BAH
AVGO
CBOE
CI
KO
CL
CMCSA
CMPGY
DLB
EA
EXPGY
XOM
ADRNY
LHX
LDOS
LLY
LMT
LULU
MTB
MSCI
MMC
MA
MCK
MRK
MSFT
NTAP
NYT
NICE
GEN
NVDA
PSA
RGA
RELX
SHEL
SPGI
CRM
NOW
SHW
STN
TSM
TMO
UNH
VZ
VRTX
V
WMT
YUM
DOX
ETN
EG
G
MDT
QQQ
ABBV
ADBE
ACM
BIL
GLD
GBTC
DOG
-2%
YTD
SPY
FDVV
GLDM
JPIE
SCHO
GBTC
XLF
1 / 19

Recent discussions

Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio

Do the screens just pick the 10 stock portfolio & has the selection been the same for awhile? Seems like a no-brainer way to go based on performance, ease, expense. Just trying to get some clarity on this lazy portfolio.

4803heights

April 05, 25 Posted in general
180

Transactional Portfolio Use

I am trying to understand how to make the best use of transactional portfolios. At first I thought it is useful when tracking the performance of a self-managed fund. You add cash to it, transact in equities, adding each transaction to the portfolio. It then shows you its performance wrt. to a benchmark. The broker does this for you anyway, but the whole reason I started evaluating Portfolioslab is so that I can separate my single broker account into thematic baskets ("thematic funds") and track their performance individually.

The transactional portfolio in Portfolioslab does not seem to work that way. It does not consider the changes in cash position, ie. any profit/loss made on equity transactions. It does not seem to be suited for track the assets of a fund, so to speak. What good is transactional portfolio then?

EG

May 14, 24 Posted in general
565

Getting Historical Performance - capped by available data?

It seems that earliest start date for the historical performance is limited by the available data on the stock or ETF. For example, if you include PLTR or FSELX in the portfolio, the historical data will only go back a max of 4 years. Including GLDM caps the historical data to a max of 6 years. Is there any way to insert null values in the calculation for any stocks that do not have the data within the chosen historical timeframe?

Silverback

August 15, 24 Posted in general
334